Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

Community-based Adapted Tango Dancing for Individuals with Parkinson's Disease and Older Adults
Published on: December 9, 2014
Normative Data for Preseason Screening Assessments in Female University Contemporary Dancers
Jada L Kiss1, Meghan L Critchley1,2,3, Sarah J Kenny1,2,4,5
1Sport Injury Prevention Research Center, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract:
Kiss, JL, Critchley, ML, and Kenny, SJ. Normative data for preseason screening assessments in female university contemporary dancers. J Strength Cond Res 39(9): e1099-e1104, 2025-Injury incidence rates in elite-level dance are high. Normative values from preseason screening can inform training to target areas for improvement and minimize future injury risk. The purpose of this study was to establish mean/median values, proportions, and percentiles for hip and ankle joint range of motion, dynamic balance, and isometric hip strength in female preprofessional contemporary dancers. One hundred sixty-six dancers (mean age: 18.9 ± 1.83 years) participated in preseason screening at the beginning of 6 academic years (2015, 2018, 2019, and 2021-2023). Measures included: ankle and hip range of motion [dorsiflexion (degrees), plantarflexion (degrees), and total active standing turnout (TAT) (degrees)], dynamic balance [unipedal dynamic balance (UDB) (in seconds) and Y-balance test (YBT) (cm)], and hip abduction strength (HAS) (N, N/kg body mass). Mean dorsiflexion was 46.5° (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.5-47.5), mean plantarflexion was 86.9° (95% CI: 85.7-88.1), and mean TAT was 105° (95% CI: 102.7-108.5). Median UDB was 4.9 seconds (IQR: 3.8-7.11). Mean YBT anterior reach was 56.0 cm (95% CI: 55.2-56.9), and mean YBT composite score was 87.0 cm (95% CI: 86.0-88.1). Mean absolute HAS was 265.9 N (95% CI: 253.4-278.4), and mean normalized HAS was 4.5 N·kg -1 body mass (95% CI: 4.3-4.7). Paired t -tests and Wilcoxon sum rank tests were used to examine side-to-side differences (α = 0.05). Percentile analysis for screening assessments was conducted. There were no side-to-side differences between dominant and nondominant legs. Female university dancers' preseason screening scores can be compared with normative data from the present study to identify areas for improvement to tailor supplementary training. Future prospective research is recommended to establish associations of these measures with dance-related injury risk.
More Related Videos
06:28Author Spotlight: Developing Low-Tech Balance Assessment Methods for Broad-Spectrum Healthcare Applications
Published on: September 1, 2023
10:08Effects of a Novel Neuromuscular Training Intervention on Jump, Sprint, and Change of Direction in Adult Female Soccer Players
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Social Facilitation
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include: