Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos
Published on: December 7, 2018
Different Tools, Different Results: Comparing Methods for Bullying Assessment in Autistic and ADHD Youth
Hannah E Morton1,2, Summer B Bottini3,4, Alana J McVey5
1TEACCH Autism Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. Hannah_morton@med.unc.edu.
Bullying assessment tools vary in accuracy for autistic and ADHD youth. A disability-specific measure, the Assessment of Bullying Experiences (ABE), better identifies victimization risks compared to general questionnaires.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Special Education
Background:
- Autistic and ADHD youth experience higher rates of peer victimization, leading to negative educational and mental health outcomes.
- Existing bullying interventions show limited success in these populations, partly due to inconsistent assessment methods.
- General bullying assessment tools may not adequately capture the unique experiences of autistic and ADHD youth.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement and sensitivity of three bullying assessment methods: a single-item assessment, the Olweus Bullying Questionnaire (OBQ), and the Assessment of Bullying Experiences (ABE).
- To examine group differences in victimization risk among autistic, ADHD, and community youth.
- To determine the most effective method for assessing bullying in autistic and ADHD populations.
Main Methods:
- Caregivers of 516 autistic, ADHD, and community youth completed the single-item assessment, OBQ, and ABE.
- Agreement across measures was analyzed using percent agreement, Cohen's kappa, and McNemar's tests.
- Logistic regression models identified group differences in bullying classification for each measure.
Main Results:
- Moderate agreement was found between the OBQ and ABE overall, but agreement weakened within autistic and ADHD groups.
- The single-item assessment underestimated bullying prevalence and failed to detect group differences.
- ADHD youth showed significantly higher bullying risk (OR=2.81, OBQ; OR=2.76, ABE). Autistic youth with co-occurring ADHD vulnerability was identified only by ABE (OR=2.34).
Conclusions:
- Single-item and general bullying assessment tools have limitations in capturing disability-specific victimization experiences.
- The ABE demonstrates greater sensitivity in assessing bullying among autistic and ADHD youth due to its inclusion of disability-specific behaviors.
- Theory-driven frameworks and disability-specific assessments are crucial for improving bullying risk assessment and intervention for autistic and ADHD youth.
More Related Videos
13:09Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.