Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

520
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
520
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors01:15

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

814
The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte...
814
UV–Vis Spectrometers01:14

UV–Vis Spectrometers

1.5K
The absorbance of UV and visible (UV–visible) radiations is measured using a UV–visible spectrophotometer. Deuterium lamps, which emit UV radiation, and tungsten lamps, which produce radiation in the visible region, are used as light sources in UV–visible spectrophotometers. A monochromator or prism is used for diffraction grating, i.e., to split the incoming radiation into different wavelengths. A system of slits is used to focus the desired wavelength on the sample cell.
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optical Caliper for Contactless Measurement of Plant Stem Diameter.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Examining the Gaze Behaviour and Decision-Making of Field Hockey Players In Situ.

European journal of sport science·2025
Same author

Coupling heart rate and power data in professional road cycling: Shorter heart rate response indicate better 10-min time trial power output.

Journal of sports sciences·2025
Same author

Personalized physical activity recommendations for people with axial spondyloarthritis using wearable activity tracker data: an exploratory study.

Rheumatology international·2025
Same author

Performance Characterization of an Illumination-Based Low-Cost Multispectral Camera.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

The Push Forward in Rehabilitation: Validation of a Machine Learning Method for Detection of Wheelchair Propulsion Type.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

50.0K

Machine Learning-Based Identification of Plastic Types Using Handheld Spectrometers.

Hedde van Hoorn1, Fahimeh Pourmohammadi1, Arie-Willem de Leeuw2

  • 1Photonics Research Group, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Handheld spectral devices offer a low-cost solution for plastic identification, crucial for recycling efforts. While less accurate than bench-top systems, the SpectraPod achieved 93% accuracy, showing promise for field applications.

Keywords:
benchmarkinghandheldmachine learningplastic identificationspectroscopy

More Related Videos

Extraction of Organochlorine Pesticides from Plastic Pellets and Plastic Type Analysis
10:12

Extraction of Organochlorine Pesticides from Plastic Pellets and Plastic Type Analysis

Published on: July 1, 2017

11.7K
Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
14:10

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

50.0K
Extraction of Organochlorine Pesticides from Plastic Pellets and Plastic Type Analysis
10:12

Extraction of Organochlorine Pesticides from Plastic Pellets and Plastic Type Analysis

Published on: July 1, 2017

11.7K
Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
14:10

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Materials Science
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Global plastic waste necessitates improved recycling infrastructure.
  • High-end spectral imaging systems are not feasible in all regions.
  • Low-cost, handheld spectral devices could enable plastic identification in diverse settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of two handheld infrared spectral devices for plastic identification.
  • To benchmark handheld devices against a high-resolution bench-top spectral approach.
  • To identify limitations and suggest improvements for handheld plastic identification technology.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated two handheld devices: Plastic Scanner and SpectraPod.
  • Compared handheld devices to a high-resolution bench-top spectral system.
  • Employed machine learning models (SVM, XGBoost, Random Forest, Gaussian Naïve Bayes) on diverse plastic samples (PET, HDPE, PVC, LDPE, PP, PS).

Main Results:

  • High-resolution spectroscopy achieved 97% accuracy.
  • SpectraPod achieved 93% accuracy, while Plastic Scanner achieved 70% accuracy.
  • Handheld device accuracy was limited by spectral range and sensitivity.

Conclusions:

  • Handheld spectral devices show potential for plastic identification, particularly the SpectraPod.
  • Combining features of both devices could enhance handheld accuracy.
  • Further development is needed to overcome limitations for widespread adoption in plastic recycling.