Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Research on Candida albicans Biofilm-Associated Prosthetic Joint Infections
Published on: February 2, 2024
Bone Biopsy Microbiology Does Not Explain Clinical Severity in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis
Javier Aragón-Sánchez1, Gerardo Víquez-Molina2, José María Rojas-Bonilla2
1Department of Surgery, Diabetic Foot Unit, La Paloma Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Abstract:
Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is the most frequent infection in diabetes-related foot ulcers, often associated with delayed healing, prolonged hospitalization, and increased risk of amputation. The contribution of microbiological factors to its clinical severity remains uncertain. While severe cases are often associated with soft tissue complications such as abscesses or necrotizing infections, it is unclear whether the bacterial profile influences infection severity. This study aimed to determine whether severe presentations are associated with a higher frequency of polymicrobial infections, multidrug-resistant organisms, or specific bacterial species. We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with moderate or severe diabetic foot infections confirmed to involve osteomyelitis through histopathological evaluation. Bacterial species isolated from bone biopsy cultures were compared between moderate and severe cases. Among 114 patients included, 73 were classified as moderate and 41 as severe. Bone cultures were positive in 101 cases, yielding 173 isolates. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated species, followed by Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus agalactiae. No significant differences were found between severity groups in the distribution of individual species, polymicrobial cultures (46.6% in moderate vs 56.1% in severe; p = 0.435), or multidrug-resistant organisms (12.3% vs 12.2%; p = 1.000). A global comparison of species distribution also showed no statistical association with severity (p = 0.941). These findings suggest that severity is not explained by the microbiological profile identified through conventional aerobic cultures. Instead, host-related or anatomical factors may be more relevant, although the lack of anaerobic cultures may have underestimated microbial diversity.
Insights
Microbiological factors do not explain the severity of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Host or anatomical factors are likely more influential in severe diabetic foot infections.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Diabetology
- Microbiology
Background:
- Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is a common complication of diabetes-related foot ulcers.
- It frequently leads to delayed healing, extended hospitalization, and amputation.
- The role of specific microbiological factors in disease severity is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if severe diabetic foot osteomyelitis is linked to polymicrobial infections, multidrug-resistant organisms, or specific bacterial species.
- To compare the microbiological profiles of moderate versus severe diabetic foot osteomyelitis cases.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.
- Inclusion of patients with moderate or severe diabetic foot infections and confirmed osteomyelitis via histopathology.
- Comparison of bacterial species isolated from bone biopsy cultures between severity groups.
Main Results:
- 114 patients were analyzed; 73 moderate and 41 severe cases.
- 173 isolates were identified from 101 positive bone cultures.
- No significant differences in species distribution, polymicrobial infections (46.6% vs 56.1%), or multidrug-resistant organisms (12.3% vs 12.2%) between moderate and severe groups.
- Overall species distribution showed no statistical association with severity (p=0.941).
Conclusions:
- The microbiological profile, based on aerobic cultures, does not appear to explain the severity of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.
- Host-related or anatomical factors may play a more significant role.
- The study acknowledges that anaerobic cultures were not performed, potentially limiting the assessment of microbial diversity.

