Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

05:26
Establishing a Mouse Model of Thin Endometrium
Published on: November 1, 2024
963
Comparison of Teat End Massage Characteristics Across Liner Types Using a Modeling Device
1Hokkaido Dairy Management Services, Tsurui, Hokkaido, Japan.
Animal Science Journal = Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho
|June 30, 2025
Summary
Teat end massages (TEMs) were higher with increased vacuum and depth. Non-round liners and specific pulsation ratios significantly impacted TEMs, guiding recommendations for optimal liner design to promote teat end health.
Area of Science:
- Dairy science
- Veterinary medicine
- Biomechanical engineering
Background:
- Teat end health is crucial for dairy animal welfare and productivity.
- Liner design in milking systems is a key factor influencing teat end condition.
- Understanding the biomechanics of teat end massage (TEM) is essential for optimizing milking practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of various liner shapes and vacuum settings on teat end massages (TEMs).
- To provide data for assessing how liner design influences teat end condition.
- To identify optimal liner configurations for promoting teat end health.
Main Methods:
- Simulated teat ends using silicon droppers attached to a stainless tube with pressure sensors.
- Tested twelve different liner types under vacuum levels of 40 and 50 kPa.
- Varied liner depth (7 and 10 cm) and pulsation ratios, recording TEMs at 0.1-second intervals.
Main Results:
- TEMs were consistently higher at 50 kPa compared to 40 kPa across all liners.
- Increased liner depth to 10 cm resulted in higher TEMs than at 7 cm.
- Significant differences in TEMs were found among liner types, with non-round liners showing higher values; D-phase duration correlated with average TEMs.
Conclusions:
- Higher vacuum (50 kPa) and greater depth (10 cm) increase TEMs.
- Liner design, particularly non-round shapes, significantly affects TEMs.
- Recommendations include using round liners with outer ribs or specific pulsation ratios (60:40) for improved teat end health.

