Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
Patient-specific deep learning tracking for real-time 2D pancreas localisation in kV-guided radiotherapy
Abdella M Ahmed1, Levi Madden1, Maegan Stewart1,2
1Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.
Background And Purpose:
In pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), accurate motion management is crucial for the safe delivery of high doses per fraction. Intra-fraction tracking with magnetic resonance imaging-guidance for gated SBRT has shown potential for improved local control. Visualisation of pancreas (and surrounding organs) remains challenging in intra-fraction kilo-voltage (kV) imaging, requiring implanted fiducials. In this study, we investigate patient-specific deep-learning approaches to track the gross-tumour-volume (GTV), pancreas-head and the whole-pancreas in intra-fraction kV images.
Materials And Methods:
Conditional-generative-adversarial-networks were trained and tested on data from 25 patients enrolled in an ethics-approved pancreatic SBRT trial for contour prediction on intra-fraction 2D kV images. Labelled digitally-reconstructed-radiographs (DRRs) were generated from contoured planning-computed-tomography (CTs) (CT-DRRs) and cone-beam-CTs (CBCT-DRRs). A population model was trained using CT-DRRs of 19 patients. Two patient-specific model types were created for six additional patients by fine-tuning the population model using CBCT-DRRs (CBCT-models) or CT-DRRs (CT-models) acquired in exhale-breath-hold. Model predictions on unseen triggered-kV images from the corresponding six patients were evaluated against projected-contours using Dice-Similarity-Coefficient (DSC), centroid-error (CE), average Hausdorff-distance (AHD), and Hausdorff-distance at 95th-percentile (HD95).
Results:
The mean ± 1SD (standard-deviation) DSCs were 0.86 ± 0.09 (CBCT-models) and 0.78 ± 0.12 (CT-models). For AHD and CE, the CBCT-model predicted contours within 2.0 mm ≥90.3 % of the time, while HD95 was within 5.0 mm ≥90.0 % of the time, and had a prediction time of 29.2 ± 3.7 ms per contour.
Conclusion:
The patient-specific CBCT-models outperformed the CT-models and predicted the three contours with 90th-percentile error ≤2.0 mm, indicating the potential for clinical real-time application.
More Related Videos
05:49Generation of an Orthotopic Xenograft of Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Ultrasound-Guided Injection
Published on: November 1, 2021
10:23Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
Published on: September 2, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET