Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

08:16
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
Published on: March 13, 2014
19.0K
Friends on the Other Side: Receptiveness to Opposing Views Predicts Formation of Politically Heterogeneous
Brian P Reschke1, Julia A Minson2, Hannah Riley Bowles2
1University of Melbourne, Australia.
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|June 30, 2025
Summary
Receptiveness to opposing views helps build relationships across political divides. This willingness to engage with different perspectives fosters collaboration, even between ideologically opposed individuals.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Political Science
- Sociology
Background:
- Partisanship increasingly divides society.
- Understanding factors that bridge ideological divides is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how "receptiveness to opposing views" influences relationship formation and collaboration across ideological lines.
- To determine if receptiveness is a unique predictor compared to other personality traits.
Main Methods:
- Utilized three studies: a retrospective network analysis, a time-lagged field study, and an experiment.
- Measured individual differences in receptiveness and relationship outcomes.
Main Results:
- Individual and mutual receptiveness significantly mitigated the negative impact of ideological opposition on relationship formation.
- Receptiveness positively predicted willingness to collaborate with ideologically opposed others.
- Receptiveness showed distinct influence compared to extraversion, self-monitoring, agreeableness, openness, and intellectual humility.
Conclusions:
- Receptiveness to opposing views is a key individual difference for fostering cross-ideological relationships and collaboration.
- Findings highlight the importance of individual willingness to engage with diverse perspectives in bridging societal divides.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
41.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.2K
Group Polarization
35.6K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.6K
Surveys
15.4K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.4K
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
In- and Out-Groups
40.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
40.1K
Social Proof
28.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.7K

