Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer at Early Stage with Laparoscopy
Published on: August 19, 2021
Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node-Mapping Method for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing
Eun-Gyeong Lee1, Dong-Eun Lee2, So-Youn Jung1
1Department of Surgery, Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Multimodal sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping effectively identifies nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. The radioisotope plus indocyanine green fluorescence method offers a reliable dual-approach for improved detection rates.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Breast Cancer Research
Background:
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves outcomes for breast cancer, particularly HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes.
- Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping post-NAC faces challenges with lower identification and higher false-negative rates compared to early-stage disease.
- Accurate SLN assessment is crucial for treatment stratification and prognosis after NAC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal SLN-mapping approach following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.
- To compare the SLN identification rates and operation times of different multimodal mapping techniques.
- To determine the optimal combination of techniques for post-NAC SLN detection.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial involving 270 breast cancer patients undergoing NAC.
- Patients were randomized into three arms: Arm A (radioisotope [RI] + indocyanine green fluorescence [ICG-F]), Arm B (RI + vital dye), and Arm C (ICG-F + vital dye).
- Primary outcome was the SLN-identification rate; secondary outcome was SLN-operation time.
Main Results:
- Arm A (RI + ICG-F) demonstrated a high SLN-identification rate of 95%, significantly higher than Arm C (79%).
- Comparing Arms A and B, final analysis showed comparable SLN-identification rates (92.6% vs. 90.6%) but a significantly shorter mean detection time in Arm B (7 min vs. 8 min).
- Intra-arm analysis revealed significant differences in detection rates based on the method used, particularly lower rates for vital dye alone in Arm B (72.9%).
Conclusions:
- Multimodal SLN-mapping achieves high post-NAC identification rates in breast cancer.
- While intra-arm identification rates were similar across combinations, specific methods within arms showed varied performance.
- The combination of radioisotope and indocyanine green fluorescence (RI + ICG-F) is an effective dual-method approach for SLN mapping after NAC.
More Related Videos
07:51The Application of 1% Methylene Blue Dye As a Single Technique in Breast Cancer Sentinel Node Biopsy
Published on: June 1, 2019
06:37Multispectral Real-time Fluorescence Imaging for Intraoperative Detection of the Sentinel Lymph Node in Gynecologic Oncology
Published on: October 20, 2010