Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains
Published on: November 30, 2021
Human, Animal, or Mineral? Ethical Considerations for Studies of Fossilized Hominin Remains
Thomas H Champney1, Heather F Smith2,3, Sabine Hildebrandt4
1Department of Cell Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Abstract:
Ethical considerations around research and education with modern human subjects, use of human tissue, and studies involving humans are ubiquitous within the global scientific community. This commentary explores considerations around how and whether these types of ethical considerations may apply to hominin fossils. While some might propose that the age of a fossil could be the basis for decisions around their ethical handling, it may be that characteristics or behaviors of the hominins are a more appropriate measure to determine their ethical status. These types of ethical considerations have recently been examined in other historical human tissues, such as mummies and ancient DNA, with these ethical explorations being driven by a recognition of evolving ethical perspectives around the world. Thus, there is both the precedent and stimulus for the paleoanthropology community to revisit current ethical practices within the profession. Doing so would help identify and establish standards that are reflective of global perspectives around the contemporary ethical management of hominin fossils, and potentially assist in aligning these practices with other disciplines that work with both hominin fossils and human tissues.
Related Concept Videos
The Fossil Record
Ethics in Research
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
The Evidence for Evolution
Naturalistic Observations
Ethics and Bioethics

