Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
How much variation exists amongst experienced surgeons in orthognathic surgical planning?
Benjamin Palla1, Sebastian Graca1, Steven Licht1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
None:
Discussions of orthognathic planning are often dogmatic, however, it is a subjective science. The aim of this study was to quantify the variation in orthognathic surgery planning in a group of experienced orthognathic surgeons. A cross-sectional study was designed, and an identical presurgical orthognathic case provided to 13 surgeons. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, and MANOVA with p < 0.05 considered significant. The mean (SD) anterior-posterior (AP) movement of the upper incisors was 5.8 (1.5) mm anterior (range 3.0-7.0 mm), and 0.7 mm (-0.7 (1.9) mm; range -2.9 to 4.0 mm). The mean (SD) AP movement of pogonion was 0.6 mm posterior (-0.6 (2.2) mm; range 5.5 mm posterior to 2.1 mm anterior). The standard deviations in movement (AP and superior-inferior) were greatest at pogonion (2.3 mm and 1.9 mm), followed by B-point (1.9 mm and 2.0 mm), maxillary incisor (1.5 mm and 1.9 mm), then A-point (1.4 mm and 1.8 mm). This study shows that significant variation exists in surgical planning among a group of experienced orthognathic surgeons at the level of pogonion and B-point, with less variation at the maxillary central incisor and A-point. Future studies may compare these results with surgeons with less orthognathic expertise, or non-OMS trained surgeons.

