Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

An Easy and Flexible Inoculation Method for Accurately Assessing Powdery Mildew-Infection Phenotypes of Arabidopsis and Other Plants
Published on: March 9, 2021
Genotype by environment interaction analysis for resistance against powdery mildew and yellow rust in some promising
Amritpal Mehta1, Daisy Basandrai2,3, Harneet Kaur1
1Department of Plant Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, 176062, India.
Background:
Powdery mildew (PM), caused by Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, and yellow rust (YR), caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, constitute significant threats to wheat production, resulting in both qualitative and quantitative losses. Although fungicides can effectively manage these diseases, their application introduces environmental and health risks and foster the development of pathogen resistance. The development and implementation of wheat genotypes that exhibit resistance to PM and YR present a sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible alternative to chemical treatments.
Results:
In the present study, influence of environmental factors and genotype by-environment interaction (GEI) was evaluated on 142 wheat genotypes for PM and YR across four and three geographically diverse hotspot locations, respectively. The AMMI analysis of variance revealed that GEI and genotype (G) accounted for most of the variation observed for PM and YR. Twenty genotypes were moderately resistant to PM at seedling stage. Notably, ten genotypes demonstrated high resistance to PM, while 37 were identified as resistant to YR. Furthermore, 30 genotypes exhibited slow mildewing resistance to PM at the adult plant stage. The combined analysis utilizing AMMI and GGE biplots indicated that the genotypes Pollmer/CTY88.547, Syros, and Talent (Pm5 + ?) portrayed the highest level of combined resistance to both PM and YR across the evaluated locations. Additionally, the environments Kukumseri 2016 (E2 and En1) were the most effective for testing and selecting superior wheat genotypes for resistance to PM and YR, respectively.
Conclusion:
Integrating the strength of AMMI and GGE approaches enhances the accuracy of wheat genotype selection in multi- environment trials. Methods used showed strong agreement in identifying wheat genotypes resistant to PM and YR when facing diverse environmental factors.
More Related Videos
10:26Author Spotlight: Integrating Biochemical Functions of β-Glucanases and Peroxidase Enzymes in Wheat-RWA Interaction
Published on: July 26, 2024
08:36Development of Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes TILLING Populations in Small Grain Crops by Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis
Published on: July 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Monohybrid Crosses
Gene-Environment Interactions
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Dihybrid Crosses
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...