Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Implementation and outcome of personalized treatment strategies in advanced genitourinary cancers
A Klostermann1, T Debertshäuser2, M Benary2
1Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Background:
Outcome is dismal in patients with advanced genitourinary (GU) cancers refractory to standard treatments. Molecular analyses and subsequent discussion of cases in specialized molecular tumor boards (MTBs) are increasingly incorporated into clinical management to facilitate personalized treatment. Data on this approach are lacking for GU malignancies.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with GU cancers discussed in the MTB at the Charité between 2016 and 2023. Ethics approval was obtained for prospective follow-up of patients after written informed consent and for retrospective data analysis. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) >6 months or a progression-free survival (PFS) ratio between molecularly matched therapy (MMT) and previous non-MMT >1.3. Outcome was assessed by the investigators.
Results:
Among 126 identified MTB patients, most patients had a rare tumor type (n = 59), followed by adenocarcinoma of the prostate (n = 45), urothelial carcinoma (n = 17) and clear-cell renal carcinoma (n = 5). Molecular profiling included immunohistochemistry (n = 80), panel sequencing (n = 110) and/or whole-exome/-transcriptome sequencing (n = 21). Eleven patients died before the final MTB discussion. At least one treatment option for MMT was identified for 78/115 patients (68%). Twenty-five patients were treated with an MMT (22%), three of whom subsequently received a second MMT. Eighteen MMTs were given in an off-label setting and two within clinical trials. A clinical benefit was observed in 8/28 (28.6%) applied MMTs. A PFS-ratio >1.3 was achieved in eight patients. Among patients with rare entities discussed (n = 54), 42 patients had at least one MMT option (78%), with 19 patients receiving at least one MMT (35%).
Conclusion:
For a majority of GU cancer patients an MMT was identified and responses were seen in heavily pretreated patients. Additional controlled trials and integration of comprehensive molecular analyses and subsequent personalized therapy should be considered for patients with GU cancers, especially those with rare histologies.
Insights
Molecular tumor boards identified personalized treatments for many advanced genitourinary (GU) cancer patients, showing clinical benefit in a significant portion, especially those with rare tumor types.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genitourinary Cancers
- Personalized Medicine
Background:
- Advanced genitourinary (GU) cancers refractory to standard treatments have a poor prognosis.
- Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) are increasingly used for personalized treatment strategies.
- Limited data exist on the efficacy of MTBs in GU malignancies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of molecular tumor board discussions on treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with GU cancers.
- To assess the identification of molecularly matched therapies (MMTs) and their clinical benefit.
- To analyze outcomes in patients with rare GU tumor types.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 126 GU cancer patients discussed in an MTB from 2016-2023.
- Molecular profiling included immunohistochemistry, panel sequencing, and whole-exome/transcriptome sequencing.
- Clinical benefit defined as CR, PR, or SD >6 months, or PFS ratio >1.3 for MMT vs. non-MMT.
Main Results:
- MMT options were identified for 68% of patients (78/115).
- 22% of patients (25/115) received an MMT, with 28.6% (8/28) showing clinical benefit.
- Patients with rare GU entities had a higher rate of MMT options (78%) and MMT treatment (35%).
Conclusions:
- Molecular tumor boards can identify MMT options for a majority of GU cancer patients, including those heavily pretreated.
- Clinical responses were observed in patients receiving MMTs.
- Further controlled trials and integration of molecular analyses are recommended for GU cancers, particularly rare histologies.
More Related Videos
06:38A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Tumor Immunotherapy