Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.7K
Charting multidimensional ideological polarization across demographic groups in the USA
Jaume Ojer1, David Cárcamo1, Romualdo Pastor-Satorras1
1Departament de Física, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Nature Human Behaviour
|July 2, 2025
Summary
Ideological polarization has increased as Democrats and Republicans move apart. While demographic groups align with parties, their ideological distance hasn't grown, and partisan sorting declined recently.
Area of Science:
- Political Science
- Sociology
- Computational Social Science
Background:
- Debate exists on whether ideological polarization has increased or if voters have merely sorted into ideologically aligned parties.
- Understanding the dynamics of ideological shifts and partisan alignment is crucial for analyzing contemporary political landscapes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a methodology for quantifying multidimensional ideological polarization.
- To analyze the temporal movements of political and socioeconomic groups within a two-dimensional ideological space.
- To investigate changes in ideological distance and partisan sorting over time.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel methodology to embed respondents from the American National Election Studies into a two-dimensional ideological space.
- Utilized a wide array of political, social, and economic topics for ideological measurement.
- Identified demographic attributes to track group movements and ideological changes over time.
Main Results:
- Income and racial groups show increased alignment with political parties, but their ideological distance has not widened.
- Significant ideological divergence between the Democratic and Republican parties observed over the past 30 years, with both moving from the center.
- Democratic voters exhibited increased ideological heterogeneity after 2010, suggesting a decline in partisan sorting.
Conclusions:
- The study confirms an increase in ideological polarization between the two major parties, not solely due to partisan sorting.
- Demographic sorting into parties has occurred, but it does not fully explain the growing ideological gap.
- Recent trends indicate a potential decrease in partisan sorting among Democratic voters, highlighting evolving political dynamics.
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
35.6K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.6K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
91.6K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
91.6K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.9K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.9K
Multiple Bar Graph
7.9K
As the name suggests, a multiple bar graph is the same as a bar graph but has multiple bars to depict relationships between different data values. One can include as many parameters as possible. However, each parameter must have the same unit of measurement.
Each bar or column in the multiple bar graph represents a data value. These graphs are used primarily in interrelating two or more sets of data. The categories of different kinds of data are listed along the horizontal or x-axis, whereas...
Each bar or column in the multiple bar graph represents a data value. These graphs are used primarily in interrelating two or more sets of data. The categories of different kinds of data are listed along the horizontal or x-axis, whereas...
7.9K
In- and Out-Groups
40.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
40.1K
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K

