Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

A Rapid Method for Modeling a Variable Cycle Engine
Published on: August 13, 2019
Comparative analysis of model compression techniques for achieving carbon efficient AI
Eileen Paula1, Jayesh Soni2, Himanshu Upadhyay3
1Applied Research Center, Florida International University, Miami, 33174, USA.
None:
The growing computational demands of models, such as BERT, have raised concerns about their environmental impact. This study addresses the pressing need for sustainable Artificial Intelligence practices by investigating the efficiency of model compression techniques in reducing the energy consumption and carbon emissions of transformer-based models without compromising performance. Specifically, we applied pruning, knowledge distillation, and quantization to transformer-based models (BERT, DistilBERT, ALBERT, and ELECTRA) using the Amazon Polarity Dataset for sentiment analysis. We also compared the energy efficiency of these compressed models against inherently carbon-efficient transformer models, such as TinyBERT and MobileBERT. To evaluate each model's energy consumption and carbon emissions, we utilized the open-source tool CodeCarbon. Our findings indicate that applying model compression techniques resulted in a reduction in energy consumption of 32.097% for BERT with pruning and distillation, [Formula: see text]% for DistilBERT with pruning, 7.12% for ALBERT with quantization, and 23.934% for ELECTRA with pruning and distillation, while maintaining performance metrics within a range of 95.871-99.062% accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and ROC AUC except for ALBERT with quantization. Specifically, BERT with pruning and distillation achieved 95.90% accuracy, 95.90% precision, 95.90% recall, 95.90% F1-score, and 98.87% ROC AUC; DistilBERT with pruning achieved 95.87% accuracy, 95.87% precision, 95.87% recall, 95.87% F1-score, and 99.06% ROC AUC; ELECTRA with pruning and distillation achieved 95.92% accuracy, 95.92% precision, 95.92% recall, 95.92% F1-score, and 99.30% ROC AUC; and ALBERT with quantization achieved 65.44% accuracy, 67.82% precision, 65.44% recall, 63.46% F1-score, and 72.31% ROC AUC, indicating significant performance degradation due to quantization sensitivity in its already compressed architecture. Overall, this demonstrates the potential for sustainable Artificial Intelligence practices using model compression.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Efficiency of Real Machines
However, in reality, no machine can be truly ideal, and all of them experience some...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Efficiency of The Carnot Cycle
Improving Translational Accuracy
Compacting Factor test
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
Non-equilibrium in the Cell

