Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy After Aortic Valve Replacement with Sorin Freedom Solo and St. Jude Regent
Alen Karic1, Ervin Busevac1, Alma Krajnovic1
1Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Insights
The Sorin Freedom Solo (SFS) bioprosthesis showed better hemodynamic performance and left ventricular hypertrophy regression than the St. Jude Regent (STJ) mechanical valve. Personalized valve selection is crucial for aortic stenosis patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valvular disease in the elderly, primarily caused by degenerative calcification.
- Progressive AS leads to left ventricular (LV) pressure overload, concentric hypertrophy, and myocardial remodeling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement (AVR).
- To compare the hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of two different prosthetic valves.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 150 patients undergoing AVR with Sorin Freedom Solo (SFS) stentless bioprosthesis or St. Jude Regent (STJ) mechanical valve.
- Patients grouped by follow-up at six months, one year, and two years.
- Evaluated transvalvular gradient, perioperative outcomes, and survival rates.
Main Results:
- Both valves significantly reduced transvalvular gradients (p < 0.0001), with greater reduction for SFS.
- Interventricular septum thickness decreased continuously in SFS patients; STJ showed reduction only in Group 2.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased more significantly with SFS (p < 0.024), especially in Group 2.
- No significant difference in overall mortality or survival rates between the two valves.
Conclusions:
- SFS valve offers superior hemodynamic performance and LV hypertrophy regression, suitable for high-risk patients.
- STJ valve provides stable long-term function, preferred for younger, lower-risk patients.
- Personalized approach is essential for selecting appropriate prosthetic valves based on patient profiles.
Background:
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common form of valvular disease in the elderly population, with degenerative calcified valves remaining the primary cause of this condition. Due to the progressive nature of the disease, a significant reduction in aortic valve area leads to increased left ventricular (LV) pressure overload, resulting in adaptive but ultimately maladaptive concentric hypertrophy and progressive myocardial remodeling.
Objective:
The main objectives of the study were to assess the regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 150 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Sorin Freedom Solo (SFS) stentless bioprosthesis and the St. Jude Regent (STJ) mechanical valve. Patients were divided into three groups based on follow-up duration: six months, one year, and two years. changes in transvalvular gradient, perioperative outcomes, and survival rates.
Results:
The results showed a significant reduction in the transvalvular gradient for both valves (p < 0.0001), with a more pronounced decrease in patients with the SFS valve. The thickness of the interventricular septum (IVS) continuously decreased in SFS patients across all groups, whereas a significant reduction was observed only in Group 2 for STJ valves. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) showed a significantly greater increase in patients with the SFS valve (p < 0.024), particularly in Group 2. Overall mortality was 5.30% for STJ valves and 6.66% for SFS valves, with no statistically significant differences in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
The SFS valve demonstrated superior hemodynamic performance and more pronounced LV hypertrophy regression, making it a suitable option for high-risk patients. The STJ valve ensures stable long-term function and remains the preferred choice for younger patients with acceptable operative risk. These findings highlight the importance of a personalized approach in selecting valvular prostheses.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction

