Effects of iterative metal artifact reduction techniques on diagnostic performance in patients with dental artifacts
Jun Xu1, Honghao Wang1, Chenxi Wang1
1Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Background:
Metal artifacts (MAs) induced by dental prostheses in carotid computed tomography angiography (CTA) significantly impair diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) technique in mitigating these artifacts.
Methods:
Eighty-one patients with suspected vascular disorders and dental prostheses who underwent CTA imaging were retrospectively included. The CTA images were reconstructed with and without iMAR (iMAR-CTA and non-iMAR-CTA) for evaluation. Additionally, 81 matched patients without dental prostheses who underwent CTA imaging (standard CTA) served as a reference group for objective image quality assessment. Objective image quality involving signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and artifact index (AI) were analyzed. Subjective image quality was evaluated using a five-point Likert scale. Diagnostic performance was assessed by examining luminal stenosis, calcification, and aneurysm, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. Intramodality and inter-radiologist agreements were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results:
Image quality score was significantly higher for iMAR-CTA images than non-iMAR-CTA images [radiologist 1, 5 (5-5) vs. 3 (2-3); radiologist 2, 5 (4-5) vs. 3 (3-3); radiologist 3, 5 (5-5) vs. 2 (2-3), all P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in scores between iMAR-CTA and normal CTA. In the objective analysis, iMAR-CTA exhibited higher SNR and CNR and lower AI compared to non-iMAR-CTA (P<0.001). Furthermore, the objective image quality of iMAR-CTA was comparable to that of standard CTA, with no statistically significant differences in SNR (P=0.324) or CNR (P=0.109). For diagnostic performance evaluation, iMAR-CTA exhibited good to excellent agreement with DSA for luminal stenosis and aneurysm (ICC, 0.859-0.946), exceeding the moderate to good agreement of non-iMAR-CTA (ICC, 0.583-0.777). Regarding luminal stenosis severity, iMAR-CTA had higher accuracy rates (90.63-93.75%; 58/64-60/64) than non-iMAR-CTA (57.81-65.63%; 37/64-42/64). In aneurysm detection, iMAR-CTA achieved higher accuracy rates (77.78-88.89%; 7/9-8/9) than non-iMAR-CTA (44.44-66.67%; 4/9-6/9). For luminal stenosis severity and calcification, iMAR-CTA demonstrated excellent agreement (ICC, 0.908-0.910), whereas non-iMAR-CTA exhibited moderate agreement (ICC, 0.694-0.747).
Conclusions:
iMAR effectively reduces MAs, achieving image quality comparable to standard CTA without artifacts, facilitating a more reliable evaluation of carotid artery disorders in patients with dental prostheses.
More Related Videos
05:49Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
09:32Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
Related Concept Videos
01:28Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
01:25Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
01:21Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
01:18Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
01:14Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
01:10Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...