Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in overall survival for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer by race and ethnicity: results from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.

British journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Sex, Not Age, Predicts Weight Loss Outcomes With Tirzepatide: A Retrospective Analysis.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same author

Longitudinal Association of Quantitative Background Parenchymal Enhancement with Breast Cancer Risk Among Women with BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Lesion detectability and masking disparity assessment in breast tomosynthesis across diverse populations using in-silico imaging trials.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same author

Prevalence and Burden of Cardiac Amyloidosis in a Population-Based Autopsy Cohort.

Circulation·2026
Same author

A long-term image-derived AI-based risk model for primary prevention of breast cancer in individuals at high risk.

Science translational medicine·2026
Same journal

Reading the River: What the Venous System Tells Us About IVC Wall Invasion in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2026
Same journal

TROP2-targeted NIR-II Peptide Probe for Intraoperative Detection of Tumor Margins and Sentinel Nodes in Breast-conserving Surgery.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2026
Same journal

AI-assisted Radiomic Model for Cervical Cancer Recurrence Prediction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study with Experimental Validation.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2026
Same journal

Synthetic MRI and Delta Histogram Analysis: A Step Forward in Noninvasive Meningioma Grading.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2026
Same journal

Preoperative MRI Model for Predicting Inferior Vena Cava Wall Invasion in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombus.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2026
Same journal

Liver Background Uptake of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted PET Radiotracers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.0K

Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography-based Radiomics for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment:

Alex A Nguyen1, Eric A Cohen2, Omid Haji Maghsoudi3

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Radiology. Imaging Cancer
|July 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Three-dimensional (3D) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) parenchymal analysis improves breast cancer risk assessment over 2D mammography and density measurements. This 3D radiomic approach offers enhanced risk prediction for women.

Keywords:
BreastMammographyTomosynthesisVolume Analysis

More Related Videos

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

22.6K
Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
10:17

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics

Published on: January 8, 2018

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.0K
Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

22.6K
Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
10:17

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics

Published on: January 8, 2018

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Oncology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Breast density is a significant risk factor for breast cancer.
  • Current 2D mammography and density measurements have limitations in risk assessment.
  • Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) offers 3D imaging capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare volumetric radiomic parenchymal pattern analysis from 3D DBT images.
  • To evaluate performance against 2D digital mammography (DM) and 2D DBT sections.
  • To assess breast cancer risk estimation relative to breast density measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective matched case-control study of concurrent DM and DBT screening.
  • Radiomic features calculated using the Cancer Phenomics Toolkit from 3D DBT and 2D DM images.
  • Conditional logistic regression used to associate radiomic features, age, BMI, and area percent density (PD) with breast cancer risk; C statistic used for predictive ability.

Main Results:

  • Volumetric features from 3D DBT scans showed higher C statistics (mean 0.68) compared to 2D image types (mean 0.60-0.65).
  • A baseline model with age, BMI, and area PD had a C statistic of 0.60.
  • Image resolution and window size had minimal impact on performance, suggesting less computationally intensive processing is viable.

Conclusions:

  • Fully automated 3D parenchymal analysis from DBT significantly improved breast cancer risk estimation.
  • The 3D radiomic approach surpasses risk markers derived from area breast density and 2D images.
  • This technique holds promise for more accurate breast cancer risk assessment.