Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Structured Motor Rehabilitation After Selective Nerve Transfers
Published on: August 15, 2019
Quality of patient-centred recovery trajectories after different types of surgery: a prospective cohort study
Paul S Myles1, Belinda Phillips2, Sarah Robertshaw3
1Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Background:
We sought to measure patient recovery trajectory up to 90 days after surgery using both the 15-item quality of recovery score (QoR-15) (range 0-150) and the number of days alive and at home up to 30 days after surgery (DAH30).
Methods:
This prospective cohort study included adult patients undergoing either elective intermediate (mostly arthroplasty) or cardiac surgery, or day case gastroscopy (control group). We asked eligible patients to record their QoR-15 scores before their procedure and then daily via smartphone text messaging for 2 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks, and then monthly up to 90 days after their procedure to track recovery trajectory. We also recorded their DAH30. The co-primary endpoints were differences in the nadir and slope of the trajectory of recovery as measured by the QoR-15 scale. Differences between groups were compared using time series analysis.
Results:
Of 199 eligible and consenting patients who underwent surgery, 188 (94%) had complete follow-up. Median (interquartile range) nadir QoR-15 scores were 128 (93-145), 87 (70-102), and 70 (60-81) for the gastroscopy, intermediate, and cardiac surgery groups, respectively (P<0.001). Compared with the gastroscopy group (29.9 [29.9-29.9]), the median (IQR) DAH30 was lower in both the intermediate (28.8 [26.1-29.1]) and cardiac (22.9 [18.9-24.1]) surgery groups (each P<0.001). There was an association between the QoR-15 nadir and DAH30 (rho=0.52, P<0.001). Most patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the frequent text messaging.
Conclusions:
Recovery after surgery varies according to the extent of surgery and the presence of postoperative complications. Follow-up and measurement of recovery was highly valued by patients.
Registration:
Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ANBJ5).
More Related Videos
07:14A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
05:07Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
Restorative Care
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Patient-centered Care
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: