Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Factors Influencing Mistriage Based on the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
Introduction:
Mistriage is important because of its potential for serious consequences, notwithstanding the beneficial effects of the emergency patient classification system employed to alleviate overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to assess mistriage using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) and identify factors influencing it.
Design:
Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Methods:
We examined the factors influencing mistriage in the KTAS and rates of under- and over-triage. Participants were obtained by combining electronic health records with registry data from the National Emergency Department Information System. We assessed the eligibility of patients aged ≥ 15 years who visited the ED between July 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023. Using the KTAS classification criterion, two experienced experts determined the final acuity level. We employed multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the factors that predict under- and over-triage.
Results:
Of 53,947 ED encounters, 1110 participants were enrolled in this study. Mistriage occurred in 207 (18.6%) patients: 88 (7.9%) had under-triage, and 119 (10.7%) had over-triage. In adjusted analyses, under-triage was associated with lower mean arterial pressure (odds ratio [OR], 5.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-20.32) and presenting complaints of immunity or fever (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.38-8.45), while over-triage was associated with advanced age (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.98), pain (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.18-3.25), lower KTAS experience (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.08-3.51), and several specific present complaints.
Conclusions:
By improving mistriage, the quality of emergency medical services may be enhanced through reduced costs, increased operational efficiency, and improved patient safety and satisfaction. Implementation of standardized criteria, validated triage tools, and enhanced provider training is crucial for achieving more accurate emergency triage. Additionally, establishing regulatory and financial incentives and developing realistic standards for mistriage management will optimize triage processes and ensure prompt, prioritized care.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management