Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
[Leg length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty : How often and when is it problematic?]
Conradin Schweizer1, Wenzel Waldstein1,2, Joachim Herre1
1Orthopädische Klinik Paulinenhilfe, Diakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart, Rosenbergstr. 38, 70176, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
Background:
Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a frequent source of dissatisfaction and litigation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). To minimize the risk of postoperative LLD, meticulous planning before surgery and intraoperative clinical and radiographic assessment are critical.
Therapy:
The discrimination between structural and functional causes is a key aspect in the management of LLD and guides therapeutic decision-making. Functional LLDs are common in the early postoperative phase and typically respond well to conservative treatment. In patients with neurologic deficits or recurrent dislocations revision surgery is warranted. There is no universally accepted threshold for revision in patients with persistent LLD unresponsive to non-operative measures, and surgical re-intervention should be based on individual decision-making in these cases. This review summarizes current evidence on the etiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of leg length discrepancy following THA.

