Examining the Burden of Chronic Disease and Low SES to Identify High-Need Rural Counties
Gabriel A Benavidez1, Emma Boswell, Peiyin Hung
1Author Affiliations: Department of Public Health, Baylor University, Waco, Texas (Dr Benavidez) and Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Rural and Minority Health Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina (Ms Boswell, Dr Hung, and Dr Crouch).
Purpose:
This study aims to identify rural counties across the United States that experience combined high prevalence of chronic diseases and low socioeconomic status (SES), categorizing them as high-need areas. We analyze the geographic and sociodemographic profiles of these counties and examine differences in access to care for high-need rural counties.
Methods:
We used the 2023 PLACES dataset from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for chronic disease prevalence estimates and the 2020 American Community Survey for SES indicators. Counties were classified into tertiles based on disease prevalence and SES indicators, creating an overall composite score identifying counties as low, moderate, or high need. We used ArcGIS Pro to map the distribution of high-need counties across the United States with statistical analyses of geographic distribution and health care access conducted through quantile regression and spatial autocorrelation methods.
Findings:
A total of 1934 rural counties, representing nearly 99% of rural counties, were included in this analysis, identifying 534 high-need counties, primarily in the southeastern United States. These counties had significantly higher proportions of non-Hispanic Black residents. Significant spatial autocorrelation indicated that counties with similar levels of chronic disease and SES are geographically clustered. High-need counties faced greater distances to health care facilities compared to their lower-need counterparts, highlighting substantial barriers to accessing care.
Conclusion:
This analysis identified geographic variation in chronic disease burden and socioeconomic status across rural US counties, with high-need areas concentrated in the Southeast. The findings demonstrate the value of a simple, replicable framework for identifying rural counties facing overlapping health and socioeconomic challenges. This approach can support efforts to prioritize resource allocation and guide future research and policy aimed at improving access and outcomes in underserved rural communities.
More Related Videos
04:24Acupoint Application as a Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment for Fatigue Associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: September 5, 2025
05:53Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Health Literacy
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
