Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models01:15

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

Physiological models in pharmacokinetics are instrumental in understanding the distribution and elimination of drugs within the body. These models describe the drug concentration within target organs, influenced by factors such as drug uptake, tissue volume, and blood flow. Drug uptake is governed by the partition coefficient, which signifies the drug concentration ratio in tissue to that in the blood. The blood flow rate to a specific tissue is expressed as Qt, and the rate of change in tissue...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scaling and quantization of large-scale foundation model enables resource-efficient predictions in network biology.

Nature computational science·2026
Same author

Polyclonal origins of human premalignant colorectal lesions.

Nature·2025
Same author

DUNE: a versatile neuroimaging encoder captures brain complexity across 3 major diseases: cancer, dementia, and schizophrenia.

GigaScience·2025
Same author

Leveraging Open-Source Large Language Models to Identify Undiagnosed Patients with Rare Genetic Aortopathies.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Response to Antiangiogenic Therapy Is Associated with AIMP Protein Family Expression in Glioblastoma and Lower-Grade Gliomas.

Cancer research communications·2025
Same author

Integrative transcriptomic and single-cell protein characterization of colorectal carcinoma delineates distinct tumor immune microenvironments associated with overall survival.

Pathology, research and practice·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches
10:50

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches

Published on: June 21, 2022

1.8K

Evaluating Vision and Pathology Foundation Models for Computational Pathology: A Comprehensive Benchmark Study.

Olivier Gevaert1, Rohan Bareja1, Francisco Carrillo-Perez1

  • 1Stanford University School of Medicine.

Research Square
|July 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A comprehensive benchmark of 31 AI foundation models for computational pathology found Virchow2 performed best. Pathology-specific vision models (Path-VM) excelled, while model and data size did not consistently improve performance.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
07:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

Published on: December 8, 2023

1.9K
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

267

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches
10:50

Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches

Published on: June 21, 2022

1.8K
Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
07:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

Published on: December 8, 2023

1.9K
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

267

Area of Science:

  • Computational pathology
  • Artificial intelligence in medicine
  • Precision diagnostics

Background:

  • Advancing precision medicine requires robust AI foundation models for pathology.
  • Current AI models' performance and generalizability across diverse histopathology data are under-examined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark 31 AI foundation models for computational pathology.
  • To evaluate model performance across diverse datasets and tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Benchmarked 31 AI foundation models: vision models (VM), vision-language models (VLM), pathology-specific VM (Path-VM), and pathology-specific VLM (Path-VLM).
  • Evaluated models on 41 tasks from TCGA, CPTAC, external, and out-of-domain datasets.
  • Assessed performance based on disease detection, classification, and prognostic insights.

Main Results:

  • Virchow2, a pathology foundation model, achieved the highest performance across multiple datasets.
  • Path-VM models outperformed Path-VLM and general VM, ranking highly across tasks.
  • Model and data size did not consistently correlate with improved performance.

Conclusions:

  • Virchow2 demonstrates high effectiveness in diverse histopathological evaluations.
  • Path-VM models show strong potential, but further research is needed to enhance generalizability.
  • Fusion models integrating top performers offer superior generalization across diverse tissues and tasks.