Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
Published on: June 29, 2019
How to develop and evaluate consensus documents: Methods and checklists.
María Aparicio Rodrigo1, Paz González Rodríguez2, Nieves Balado Insunza3
1Centro de Salud Entrevías, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Facultad de Medicina, Madrid, Spain.
Consensus documents guide clinical decisions when evidence is limited. Rigorous methods and appraisal tools ensure their quality and reduce bias in healthcare.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Healthcare Research Methodology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Evidence-based medicine (EBM) relies on scientific evidence for clinical decisions.
- Insufficient or inconsistent evidence necessitates consensus documents to guide practice.
- Consensus documents, developed by experts, aim to reduce clinical variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define consensus documents and their importance in clinical decision-making.
- To outline rigorous methodologies for developing valid and applicable consensus documents.
- To emphasize the need for quality standards and critical appraisal of consensus reports.
Main Methods:
- Exploration of formal consensus development techniques (e.g., Delphi, Nominal Group Technique, RAND/UCLA).
- Discussion of less structured methods like consensus meetings and focus groups.
- Highlighting the role of quality standards (e.g., ACCORD guideline) in document development.
Main Results:
- Formalized processes are crucial for minimizing bias in expert panels.
- Structured methodologies enhance the validity and applicability of consensus documents.
- Quality standards and critical appraisal tools improve the reliability of recommendations.
Conclusions:
- Consensus documents are vital for clinical practice when evidence is scarce.
- Rigorous methodology and adherence to standards like ACCORD are essential for quality.
- Critical appraisal, considering panel representativeness and conflicts of interest, is necessary.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Development of Analytical Methods