Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

3-D Cell Culture System for Studying Invasion and Evaluating Therapeutics in Bladder Cancer
Published on: September 13, 2018
Impact of Industry Collaboration on US Food and Drug Administration Approval Success in Genitourinary Malignancy
Kamil Malshy1, Matthew Steidle1, Trevor C Hunt1
1Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Purpose:
Collaboration among trial sponsors can pool expertise and resources, potentially accelerating drug development and regulatory success. This study assessed whether collaborations between drug sponsors influence the likelihood and timing of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for phase III clinical trials in genitourinary cancers.
Methods:
We queried ClinicalTrials.gov for all industry-sponsored, interventional phase III trials in genitourinary malignancies completed between January 1, 2010, and October 1, 2024. Trials involving supportive agents, nontherapeutics, or bioequivalence studies were excluded. Eligible trials were grouped by sponsorship structure: single-sponsor (SS) or sponsor-collaborator (S-C). Time to FDA approval was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests. Stratified Cox regression assessed the impact of collaboration across subgroups (disease site, stage, and previous drug approval). An additional analysis examined trials that met their primary end points.
Results:
Seventy-eight trials met inclusion criteria from an initial 183. Of these, 51 (65.4%) were SS trials and 27 (34.6%) were S-C. FDA approval was granted for 20 of 27 S-C trials (74.1%) versus 20 of 51 SS trials (39.2%). S-C trials had significantly faster approval (hazard ratio [HR], 2.75 [95% CI, 1.46 to 5.18]; P = .0009). One- and 2-year approval rates were, respectively, 50.0% and 73.6% for S-C, compared with 19.6% and 31.4% for SS trials. Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent benefits across metastatic disease, prostate cancer, and previously approved drugs. Among the 50 trials that met their primary end points, S-C trials had a higher approval likelihood (HR, 2.23 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.38]; P = .013).
Conclusion:
Sponsor collaboration significantly improves FDA approval rates and timelines in phase III genitourinary cancer trials, including those meeting primary end points. This strategy may enhance trial success and accelerate access to new therapies.
Insights
Sponsor collaboration significantly boosts FDA approval rates and speeds for genitourinary cancer trials. This strategy enhances trial success and accelerates patient access to novel therapies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Drug Development
Background:
- Sponsor collaboration can pool resources and expertise.
- Accelerating drug development is crucial for patient access to novel therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if drug sponsor collaborations impact US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval likelihood and timing.
- Focus on phase III clinical trials in genitourinary cancers.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed phase III genitourinary cancer trials from ClinicalTrials.gov (2010-2024).
- Compared single-sponsor (SS) versus sponsor-collaborator (S-C) trial groups.
- Used Kaplan-Meier, log-rank tests, and Cox regression for approval timelines and likelihood.
Main Results:
- Sponsor-collaborator trials showed significantly higher FDA approval rates (74.1% vs. 39.2%).
- S-C trials had faster approval times (HR 2.75, P=.0009).
- Collaboration benefits were consistent across subgroups, including metastatic disease and prostate cancer.
Conclusions:
- Sponsor collaboration is a key factor in improving FDA approval rates and timelines for genitourinary cancer trials.
- Collaborative strategies can enhance clinical trial success.
- This approach accelerates the availability of new cancer treatments.
More Related Videos
13:34A Combined 3D Tissue Engineered In Vitro/In Silico Lung Tumor Model for Predicting Drug Effectiveness in Specific Mutational Backgrounds
Published on: April 6, 2016
15:04Potentiation of Anticancer Antibody Efficacy by Antineoplastic Drugs: Detection of Antibody-drug Synergism Using the Combination Index Equation
Published on: January 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...