Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ternary co-encapsulation in electrospun PVA fibers: release kinetics and mechanisms.

Therapeutic delivery·2026
Same author

Synthesis and Characterization of a Marine Collagen-Chitosan/HA-SiO<sub>2</sub>-Based Bioink.

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Antiproliferative Activity of α-Tocopherol, γ-Tocopherol and Tocotrienols and Their Drug Interactions Evaluated Using Loewe and Chou-Talalay Models in HeLa and MCF-7 Cancer Cell Lines.

Biomedicines·2026
Same author

Collagen-Inducing Compounds from Chihuahuan Desert Plants for Potential Skin Bioink 3D Printing Applications: A Narrative Review.

Journal of functional biomaterials·2026
Same author

Co-Release of Cytarabine and Polyphenol-Rich Extract from Polycaprolactone Microparticles Towards Leukemia Therapy.

Polymers·2026
Same author

Glutamate and excitotoxicity in central nervous system disorders: ionotropic glutamate receptors as a target for neuroprotection.

Neuroprotection (Chichester, England)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

3D Printed Porous Cellulose Nanocomposite Hydrogel Scaffolds
06:36

3D Printed Porous Cellulose Nanocomposite Hydrogel Scaffolds

Published on: April 24, 2019

9.7K

Enhancing 3D Printing of Gelatin/Siloxane-Based Cellular Scaffolds Using a Computational Model.

Marcos B Valenzuela-Reyes1, Esmeralda S Zuñiga-Aguilar1, Christian Chapa-González1

  • 1Institute of Engineering and Technology, Autonomous University of the City of Juarez, Ciudad Juárez 32310, Mexico.

Polymers
|July 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study optimized 3D bioprinting of a gelatin/siloxane hybrid material using rheology, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and machine learning. The integrated approach significantly improved construct fidelity to 94.13% CAD similarity for advanced biofabrication.

Keywords:
3D printingcomplex 3D constructcomputational modelgelatin/siloxane

More Related Videos

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures
05:52

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures

Published on: September 27, 2019

9.5K
Bioprintable Alginate/Gelatin Hydrogel 3D In Vitro Model Systems Induce Cell Spheroid Formation
16:20

Bioprintable Alginate/Gelatin Hydrogel 3D In Vitro Model Systems Induce Cell Spheroid Formation

Published on: July 2, 2018

18.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

3D Printed Porous Cellulose Nanocomposite Hydrogel Scaffolds
06:36

3D Printed Porous Cellulose Nanocomposite Hydrogel Scaffolds

Published on: April 24, 2019

9.7K
Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures
05:52

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures

Published on: September 27, 2019

9.5K
Bioprintable Alginate/Gelatin Hydrogel 3D In Vitro Model Systems Induce Cell Spheroid Formation
16:20

Bioprintable Alginate/Gelatin Hydrogel 3D In Vitro Model Systems Induce Cell Spheroid Formation

Published on: July 2, 2018

18.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Additive Manufacturing
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting is increasingly used for biomedical applications.
  • Optimizing printing parameters is crucial for achieving high-fidelity constructs.
  • Gelatin/siloxane hybrid materials offer potential for biofabrication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel methodology for optimizing extrusion-based 3D bioprinting of a gelatin/siloxane hybrid material.
  • To enhance the fidelity of 3D bioprinted constructs for biomedical applications.
  • To integrate rheological characterization, CFD simulations, and machine learning for parameter optimization.

Main Methods:

  • Rheological characterization was performed to determine material properties.
  • Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were used to model the printing process.
  • A machine-learning-based image analysis (convolutional neural network) was developed for post-printing assessment.
  • A systematic optimization strategy combining these methods was employed.

Main Results:

  • Initial printing parameters yielded 54.5% CAD similarity.
  • Optimized parameters, guided by CFD and machine learning, achieved 92.35% CAD similarity.
  • The integrated approach ultimately enabled fabrication of complex constructs with 94.13% CAD similarity.

Conclusions:

  • The synergistic combination of CFD simulation and machine learning is effective for optimizing 3D bioprinting parameters.
  • This integrated methodology significantly enhances the fidelity of biofabricated constructs.
  • The approach holds great potential for advancing complex 3D construct fabrication in biomedical applications.