Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.9K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recent Developments in AI and ML for IoT: A Systematic Literature Review on LoRaWAN Energy Efficiency and Performance Optimization.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Deep Learning on MRI Images.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

691

Enhancing LoRaWAN Performance Using Boosting Machine Learning Algorithms Under Environmental Variations.

Maram A Alkhayyal1, Almetwally M Mostafa1

  • 1Department of Information Systems, College of Computers and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate path loss prediction for Long-Range Wide-Area Networks (LoRaWANs) is improved by considering environmental factors. Boosting Machine Learning models, especially LightGBM, show superior performance in dynamic conditions.

Keywords:
LoRaWANboosting algorithmsenvironmental variationspath loss

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

691
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K
Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Wireless Communication
  • Machine Learning
  • Environmental Sensing

Background:

  • Path loss prediction is critical for Long-Range Wide-Area Network (LoRaWAN) optimization.
  • Existing Machine Learning (ML) models often overlook dynamic environmental factors like temperature, humidity, pressure, and particulate matter.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of five boosting ML models (AdaBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, GentleBoost, LogitBoost) for LoRaWAN path loss prediction under varying environmental conditions.
  • To compare these models against theoretical approaches and previous studies using metrics like RMSE, MAE, and R².
  • To analyze the trade-off between model accuracy and computational complexity (training time, inference latency, model size, energy consumption).

Main Methods:

  • Implementation and evaluation of five boosting ML algorithms: AdaBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, GentleBoost, and LogitBoost.
  • Comparison with Log-Distance and Okumura-Hata theoretical models.
  • Hyperparameter tuning using Bayesian Optimization.
  • Performance assessment using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and R².
  • Computational complexity analysis including training time, inference latency, model size, and energy consumption.

Main Results:

  • Barometric pressure was identified as the most significant environmental factor influencing path loss across all evaluated models.
  • LightGBM demonstrated superior performance, achieving the lowest RMSE (0.5166) and highest R² (0.7151).
  • LightGBM provided the optimal balance between predictive accuracy and computational efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • Boosting algorithms, particularly LightGBM, are highly effective for accurate path loss prediction in LoRaWAN environments, even under dynamic environmental conditions.
  • Incorporating environmental factors like barometric pressure significantly enhances prediction accuracy.
  • LightGBM offers a compelling solution for efficient and accurate LoRaWAN path loss modeling.