Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Multi-detection Assay for Malaria Transmitting Mosquitoes
Published on: February 28, 2015
Performance and usability evaluation of three LDH-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Kédougou, Senegal
Babacar Souleymane Sambe1, Stephanie Zobrist2, William Sheahan3
1Institut Pasteur de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.
Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) using Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) are threatened by gene deletions. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-based RDTs showed potential but HRP2 still contributed significantly to the best test performance.
Area of Science:
- Malariology
- Diagnostic Test Development
- Parasitology
Background:
- The emergence of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) parasites with deleted histidine-rich protein 2 and 3 (hrp2/hrp3) genes compromises the accuracy of HRP2-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs).
- RDTs that target Pf lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) offer a potential alternative to mitigate current product limitations and enhance malaria case management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance and usability of three lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-based RDTs in febrile patients in Kédougou, Senegal.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted involving 220 febrile patients.
- Capillary and venous blood samples were tested using HRP2-based RDTs, three LDH-based RDTs (BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf [pLDH], BIOCREDIT Pf [pLDH/HRPII], BIOCREDIT Pf/Pv [pLDH/pLDH]), microscopy, and a reference PCR assay.
- RDT performance was analyzed against antigen concentration, and usability was assessed via questionnaire.
Main Results:
- Of 220 participants, 154 (70%) were Pf-positive by PCR. The BIOCREDIT Pf (pLDH/HRPII) test showed the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (89%).
- All tested RDTs outperformed microscopy (53% sensitivity). The HRP2 line on the BIOCREDIT Pf (pLDH/HRPII) test improved sensitivity compared to the SD BIOLINE HRP2 test, while PfLDH lines alone had lower sensitivity.
- RDT performance correlated with antigen concentration, and analytical limits of detection predicted observed sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- The best-performing Plasmodium falciparum RDT utilized both HRP2 and LDH for sensitivity.
- In areas with low rates of hrp2/hrp3 deletions, PfLDH lines alone did not fully compensate for HRP2 line performance, even with improved limits of detection.
- Analytical limits of detection of RDTs can effectively predict test performance in populations with known antigen concentrations.
More Related Videos
07:40Field Postmortem Rabies Rapid Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test for Resource-Limited Settings with Further Molecular Applications
Published on: June 29, 2020
06:00Author Spotlight: Development of a Smartphone-Enhanced Paper-Based Device for Rapid Dengue NS1 Detection
Published on: January 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Automated Microbial Diagnostics