Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Relationship Between Thrombolysis-to-Puncture Time and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Xu Tong1, Baixue Jia1, Gaoting Ma2
1Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China.
Background And Objectives:
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) followed by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). There are limited data on the effect of thrombolysis-to-puncture time (TTP) on outcomes in patients with AIS undergoing IVT plus EVT.
Methods:
We selected 1,104 patients receiving IVT + EVT for anterior circulation LVO stroke from 2 prospective nationwide registries (259 cases from ANGEL-ACT in China: November 2017 to March 2019, 845 cases from German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment in Germany: June 2015 to December 2019). Based on the TTP, eligible patients were divided into 4 groups (≤30 min, 31-50 min, 51-70 min, and >70 min). The radiologic and clinical outcomes (e.g., successful recanalization [modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3] at final angiogram, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-2 at 90 days, any intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], and symptomatic ICH within 24 hours) among the 4 groups were compared by χ2 tests for trend and using multivariable logistic regression models.
Results:
In the 4 groups from ≤30 min to >70 min, 226, 282, 230, and 366 patients were included, respectively. An increased TTP was associated with a lower chance of successful recanalization (p = 0.016) and mRS score 0-2 (p = 0.002). Compared with the group of ≤30 min, the group of >70 min was less likely to achieve successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.89) and the groups of 50-70 min and >70 min had a reduced probability of mRS score 0-2 (adjusted OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.78; adjusted OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.85). No significant differences were found for any ICH or symptomatic ICH among the 4 groups after adjustment with potential confounders.
Discussion:
Delay from thrombolysis to puncture should be minimized when considering bridging IVT before EVT for patients with AIS due to anterior circulation LVO. Further studies are warranted to verify and expand on these findings.
Trial Registration Information:
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03370939 and NCT03356392.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis

