Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Impact of response to electrical cardioversion before catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a
Márton Boga1, Zoltán Salló1, Gábor Orbán1
1Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Street 68, Budapest 1122, Hungary.
Insights
Maintaining sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients predicts better outcomes following catheter ablation. Patients who maintained sinus rhythm (SR) showed higher freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia post-ablation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a significant challenge in cardiovascular medicine.
- Anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) and electrical cardioversion (ECV) are common strategies to restore sinus rhythm (SR).
- Predicting outcomes after catheter ablation in AF patients remains crucial for treatment planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) after pre-procedural electrical cardioversion (ECV) predicts outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing catheter ablation.
- To compare the efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with sustained SR post-ECV versus those with AF recurrence before ablation.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 219 persistent AF patients on AADs undergoing ECV 1-6 months prior to ablation was analyzed.
- Patients were grouped into ECV-SR (maintained SR) and ECV-AF (AF recurrence) based on pre-ablation rhythm.
- Propensity score matching created comparable groups (94 patients each) for outcome analysis.
- Follow-up was conducted for a median of 42 months, assessing freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia and AF recurrence.
Main Results:
- Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 36 months was significantly higher in the ECV-SR group (51.2%) compared to the ECV-AF group (31.4%).
- Recurrence patterns differed, with persistent AF more common in the ECV-AF group and paroxysmal AF in the ECV-SR group.
- Freedom from persistent AF at 36 months was also significantly better in the ECV-SR group (84.3%) versus the ECV-AF group (54%).
- These findings remained consistent across multi-variable adjustments and subgroups, including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only procedures.
Conclusions:
- Maintaining SR after pre-procedural ECV is a strong predictor of successful catheter ablation outcomes in persistent AF patients.
- A positive response to ECV may identify patients suitable for a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only ablation strategy.
- These results highlight the prognostic value of pre-ablation rhythm status for guiding AF management.
Aims:
We hypothesize that sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients taking anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) after pre-procedural electrical cardioversion (ECV) could predict outcomes after catheter ablation procedures.
Methods And Results:
219 persistent AF patients on AADs underwent ECV 1-6 months before ablation. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their response to ECV: patients in whom SR was restored and maintained until the ablation procedure (ECV-SR group), and patients with AF recurrence before the procedure (ECV-AF group). Then, 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create study groups (94-94 patients). The efficacy outcomes of the present study were freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia on/off AADs following a single ablation procedure and recurrence of persistent AF. The median follow-up duration was 42 (20-73) months. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 36 months was lower in the ECV-AF group compared to ECV-SR patients (31.4% vs. 51.2%, respectively; crude HR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.58-3.70, P < 0.001). The most frequent pattern of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was persistent AF in the ECV-AF group and paroxysmal AF in the ECV-SR group. Freedom from persistent AF at 36 months was 54% and 84.3%, respectively (crude HR = 3.72, 95% CI = 1.94-7.14, P < 0.001). Differences in the risk of the efficacy outcomes were similar after multi-variable adjustment and in all analysed subgroups, including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only procedures.
Conclusion:
Our findings indicate that the positive response to pre-procedural ECV may be a valuable marker for identifying persistent AF patients in whom a PVI-only strategy is sufficient.
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

