Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Utility of the US Preventive Services Task Force for Preeclampsia Risk Assessment and Aspirin Prophylaxis
Thomas F McElrath1,2,3, Arun Jeyabalan4,5, Arkady Khodursky3
1Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Brigham Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Insights
The US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines may overestimate preeclampsia risk. Moderate risk factors alone showed little value in predicting preeclampsia, leading to broad aspirin prophylaxis recommendations.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Preventive Medicine
- Clinical Epidemiology
Background:
- The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) provides guidelines for preeclampsia risk assessment and aspirin prophylaxis (AP).
- The clinical utility of these USPSTF guidelines has not been previously evaluated.
- Preeclampsia remains a significant concern in singleton pregnancies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical utility of USPSTF guidelines in identifying preeclampsia risk.
- To determine the association between preeclampsia risk factors and AP recommendations.
Main Methods:
- An observational cohort study included 5684 pregnant participants across 11 US centers and direct recruitment.
- Data were collected from July 2020 to March 2023, with analysis from October to December 2024.
- Participants were stratified into low, moderate, and high risk groups based on USPSTF criteria, and AP recommendations were recorded.
Main Results:
- 88.8% of participants were classified at increased risk (moderate or high) for preeclampsia.
- Preeclampsia rates were 3.0% (low risk), 10.5% (moderate risk), and 23.5% (high risk).
- Nulliparity significantly increased preeclampsia risk (RR, 1.48) in moderate-risk individuals without high-risk factors, while advanced maternal age decreased risk (RR, 0.79).
Conclusions:
- USPSTF criteria identify a large proportion of pregnancies at increased risk, but moderate risk factors alone have limited predictive value for preeclampsia.
- Current guidelines may lead to nonspecific aspirin prophylaxis recommendations in the moderate-risk category.
- Further refinement of risk stratification tools is needed for more precise preeclampsia prevention strategies.
Importance:
The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines on preeclampsia risk assessment and aspirin prophylaxis (AP) have not been evaluated for clinical utility.
Objective:
To evaluate which characteristics in the USPSTF guidelines identify risk status and the association of preeclampsia risk with AP recommendations.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This observational cohort study enrolled from July 2020 to March 2023 with data analysis performed from October to December 2024. Enrollment occurred at 11 centers throughout the US or via direct-to-participant recruitment. Pregnant participants aged 18 years or older with a singleton pregnancy less than 22 weeks' gestation were selected via convenience sampling.
Exposure:
The exposures were clinical factors abstracted from medical records by research coordinators, which were stratified according to USPSTF definitions of low, moderate (parity, advanced maternal age [AMA], race, and body mass index), and high (chronic hypertension, prior preeclampsia, type 1 or 2 diabetes, kidney disease, and/or autoimmune conditions) risk.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Data collected included AP recommendation, presence of USPSTF-defined moderate risk factors or high risk factors, and any preeclampsia diagnosis. Effect sizes and relative risk (RR) were calculated within risk strata.
Results:
Of 5684 participants (median [IQR] age, 30.9 [26.4-34.6] years; 267 [4.1%] Asian; 1191 [21.0%] Black; 990 Hispanic [17.4%]; 2764 [48.6%] White; and 472 [8.3%] with other race or ethnicity), 5046 (88.8%) were at increased risk of preeclampsia (3996 [70.3%] at moderate risk and 1050 [18.5%] at high risk). A total of 2438 participants (43.1%) received an AP recommendation. The overall preeclampsia rate was 12.1% (685 participants). The PE rates specific to USPSTF categories were 3.0% for those at low risk (19 of 638 participants), 10.5% for those at moderate risk (419 of 3996 patients), and 23.5% for those at high risk (247 of 1050 participants). Among individuals with 2 or more moderate risk factors but without any high risk factor, nulliparity was associated with significantly increased risk of preeclampsia (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35-1.62; P < .001), while AMA was associated with decreased risk (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.96; P = .02); there was no association with obesity (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22; P = .048) or Black race (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80-1.14; P = .63). Of 1044 participants with any high risk factors, 856 (82.0%) were recommended AP and of 634 at low risk, 538 (85.9%) were not recommended AP. In contrast, of 1942 participants with 1 moderate risk factor, 463 (23.8%) were recommended AP, and of 2032 with 2 or more moderate risk factors, 1024 (50.4%) were recommended AP.
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this prospective cohort study of 5684 singleton pregnancies, 89% of the population was assessed as having increased risk (moderate or high) of preeclampsia by USPSTF criteria. These findings suggest that moderate risk factors in the absence of high risk factors show no or low value for estimating the risk of developing preeclampsia, leading to nonspecific recommendations of AP in the moderate risk category.
More Related Videos
09:04Comprehensive Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Placenta-Targeted Drug Delivery Using Three Complementary Methods
Published on: September 10, 2018
07:51Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...