Reliability of the Five Step Assessment and Its Coefficients of Impairment in Spastic Paresis
Marjolaine Baude1,2, Maud Pradines1,2, Caroline Gault-Colas1
1Service de Rééducation Neurolocomotrice, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Objective:
To determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the Five Step Assessment (FSA) and its derived coefficients of impairment in chronic spastic paresis.
Design:
Prospective observational study.
Setting:
Study of outpatients followed in a rehabilitation department.
Participants:
In this single-center prospective study, participants (n=18) with chronic hemiparesis (>1y since injury) were evaluated by 4 raters (3 medical doctors, 1 physiotherapist; experience in hemiparesis, 14±9y).
Interventions:
All raters estimated muscle shortening, spasticity, weakness, and fatigability against the resistance of 8 key antagonists in adults twice, one week apart.
Main Outcome Measures:
FSA involves measuring 4 angles: angle of arrest at slow speed of stretch (XV1), angle of catch or clonus at fast speed of stretch (XV3, Tardieu), angle of match between maximal agonist effort and passive and active antagonist resistances (XA), residual angle of match after 15 seconds of repeated maximal amplitude active efforts (XA15), and spasticity grade Y. Four derived coefficients of impairment were studied: coefficients of shortening, CSH=(XN-XV1)/XN (XN, normally expected maximal passive joint amplitude); of spasticity, CSP=(XV1-XV3)/XV1; of weakness, CW=(XV1-XA)/XV1; and of fatigability, CF=(XA-XA15)/XA. Both intraclass correlation coefficients and mean differences were calculated for each parameter.
Results:
Among 18 participants (four women), intrarater reliability was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75) for all parameters in all muscles. Interrater reliability was good to excellent for all muscles and parameters except for spasticity grade Y and coefficient of fatigability (moderate).
Conclusions:
The 5 parameters and 4 coefficients of impairment of the FSA have moderate-to-excellent intrarater and interrater reliability in chronic spastic paresis.
More Related Videos
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
07:20Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key aspect...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Hazard Rate
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
