Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026
Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
Systematic review on biomechanical effects of high-velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation
Anke Langenfeld1, Mirjam Baechler2, Jaap Swanenburg1,3
1Integrative Spinal Research Group, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, University Hospital Balgrist and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Background:
Spinal manipulative therapy uses high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrusts which are clinically effective, but underlying mechanisms are still unknown.
Objective:
To summarize the evidence for biomechanical effects of HVLA thrusts in asymptomatic and symptomatic humans as well as for a possible link between biomechanical effects and clinical effectiveness.
Study Design:
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Methods:
An information specialist conducted systematic literature searches in six databases [Medline (OvidSP), Premedline (PubMed), CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Biosis]. Studies were selected by two authors and classified using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Results were qualitatively summarized per biomechanical output [range of motion (ROM) according to the spinal region where HVLA thrusts were applied, facet joint gapping, and spinal stiffness].
Results:
The thirty-three included studies were heterogeneous regarding participant characteristics, intervention frequency and outcomes. Twenty-seven studies reported on the effects of HVLA thrusts on spinal ROM. There is evidence increased cervical ROM following cervical HVLA thrusts on cervical ROM [9/15 studies with a positive treatment effect (5 low risk of bias/4 some concern) and increased cervical ROM following thoracic HVLA thrusts [8/8 studies (4 low risk of bias/4 some concern)]. The effects of a thoracic and lumbar HVLA thrusts on the respective ROM were less clear. Three (2 low risk/1 some concern) studies on facet joint gapping showed increased gapping following HVLA thrusts compared to side-posture positioning, and a single study (some concern) on spinal stiffness showed no effect of HVLA thrusts. Only one study (some concern) linked the biomechanical to clinical outcomes.
Conclusion:
HVLA thrusts, either applied to the cervical or the thoracic spine, appear to increase cervical ROM, based on studies with low risk and studies with some concern regarding risk of bias. For all other outcomes, the included studies were too heterogeneous and too few to draw any sound conclusion. Future studies on the biomechanical effects of HVLA thrusts should link the biomechanical to clinical outcomes such as pain and disability.
Prospero Registration:
CRD42018096963.
Related Concept Videos
01:07Conservation of Mass in Fixed, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the case of a sewer pipe, which can be modeled...
01:14Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
01:21Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
00:49Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - I