Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode
Published on: March 7, 2018
Effect of mechanical aging and steam autoclaving on the accuracy of different mechanical torque limiting devices
Elif Nur Koroglu1, İzim Turker Kader2, Berkman Albayrak2
1Lecturer, Bahçeşehir University School of Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul, Turkey.
Statement Of Problem:
Evidence is lacking regarding the accuracy of the long-term torque delivery of mechanical torque-limiting devices (MTLDs) from different manufacturers after repeated mechanical aging and sterilization.
Purpose:
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of spring- and friction-style MTLDs from 6 implant manufacturers in delivering target torque values and to assess the effects of mechanical aging and steam autoclaving on their performance.
Material And Methods:
Sixty new MTLDs from 6 manufacturers (spring-style devices: Astra Tech, Nobel Biocare, Straumann, Bilimplant; and friction-style devices: Neoss and Meisinger) were included in the present study (n=10). After initial measurements (T1), all devices underwent 500 simulated clinical uses to assess the effect of mechanical aging, after which torque values were recorded again (T2). Subsequently, each device was subjected to 100 steam autoclaving cycles under standardized conditions (134 °C, 7 minutes), and final torque values were collected (T3). All torque measurements were performed using a custom-designed device. Two accuracy metrics, absolute difference (ABSDIFF) and percentage deviation (PERDEV), were used for comparison. Statistical analyses included 2-way robust ANOVA and Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests (α=.05).
Results:
At baseline, spring-style MTLDs demonstrated significantly lower ABSDIFF values than friction-style devices (P=.001), indicating higher initial accuracy. No significant differences were found between device types after mechanical aging (P>.05). Following sterilization, torque deviation increased in spring-style devices, particularly Astra (P<.05). All devices maintained torque delivery within the clinically acceptable ±10% threshold.
Conclusions:
Spring-style MTLDs provided more accurate torque delivery initially, while friction-style devices demonstrated greater stability after repeated mechanical aging and sterilization. Device type and manufacturer-specific factors influence long-term accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Screw: Problem Solving
To evaluate the...
Circular Shafts - Elastoplastic Materials
As torque on the...
Residual Stresses in Circular Shafts
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...
Plastic Deformation in Circular Shafts
Mechanical Efficiency of Real Machines
However, in reality, no machine can be truly ideal, and all of them experience some...

