Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Latent Class Analysis Identifies Distinct Patient Phenotypes Associated With Mistaken Treatment Decisions and Adverse
Jing Qi1, Zhiqiang Wang1, Xiaoteng Ma1
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease, Clinical Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Disease, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Insights
Patients with comorbidities or smoking/drinking habits undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) face higher risks of mistaken treatment and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). These risks are significantly greater compared to healthier patient groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Technology
- Data Science
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure for coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Accurate assessment of lesion severity is crucial for optimal PCI decision-making.
- Deep learning-based fractional flow reserve (DEEPVESSEL-FFR, DVFFR) offers a novel approach to FFR assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify patient characteristics associated with suboptimal treatment decisions in PCI.
- To investigate the link between patient profiles and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) post-PCI.
- To evaluate the utility of DVFFR in stratifying PCI patient risk.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 3,840 PCI patients.
- Latent class analysis (LCA) to categorize patients into distinct groups based on eight factors.
- Definition of mistaken treatment: revascularization despite negative DVFFR or no revascularization despite positive DVFFR.
Main Results:
- Three patient classes identified: comorbidities (Class 1), smoking-drinking (Class 2), and relatively healthy (Class 3).
- Mistaken treatment rates were highest in the smoking-drinking group (15.4%) compared to the others.
- Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were most frequent in the comorbidities group (7.0%).
- Adjusted analyses confirmed higher risks of mistaken treatment in Class 1 (OR 1.96) and Class 2 (OR 1.69).
- Class 1 patients exhibited a significantly higher risk of MACE (HR 1.53).
Conclusions:
- Patient characteristics, particularly comorbidities and smoking/drinking habits, are significantly associated with increased risks of suboptimal PCI treatment.
- These patient groups also face a higher likelihood of experiencing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
- DVFFR-based risk stratification can help identify patients who may benefit from closer monitoring or tailored treatment strategies.
Abstract:
This study aimed to identify patient characteristics linked to mistaken treatments and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD) using deep learning-based fractional flow reserve (DEEPVESSEL-FFR, DVFFR). A retrospective cohort of 3,840 PCI patients was analyzed using latent class analysis (LCA) based on eight factors. Mistaken treatment was defined as negative DVFFR patients undergoing revascularization or positive DVFFR patients not receiving it. MACE included all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for unstable angina, and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Patients were classified into comorbidities (Class 1), smoking-drinking (Class 2), and relatively healthy (Class 3) groups. Mistaken treatment was highest in Class 2 (15.4% vs. 6.7%, P < .001), while MACE was highest in Class 1 (7.0% vs. 4.8%, P < .001). Adjusted analyses showed increased mistaken treatment risk in Class 1 (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.49-2.57) and Class 2 (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.28-2.25) compared with Class 3. Class 1 also had higher MACE risk (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.10-2.12). In conclusion, comorbidities and smoking-drinking classes had higher mistaken treatment and MACE risks compared with the relatively healthy class.
More Related Videos
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies