Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

32.3K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
32.3K
Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

13.6K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
13.6K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

40.7K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
40.7K
Gene Flow02:39

Gene Flow

35.6K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
35.6K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.2K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.2K
Competition02:34

Competition

22.6K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
22.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biological Sex Is Binary and Rooted in Anisogamy.

Ecology letters·2026
Same author

The geographic structure of pathogen resistance phenotypes under balancing selection.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Genomic insights into antagonistic coevolution: collagen-like protein expansion and genome plasticity in the Daphnia parasite Pasteuria ramosa.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

Waterborne transmission largely contributes to the epidemiology of a plankton parasite.

Ecology·2026
Same author

Counterproductive: coinfection of a water flea by a fungus and a microsporidium reduces the reproductive outputs of all parties.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The arduous path to obligate asexuality in Daphnia.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

3.5K

Strong Bottlenecks Constrain Adaptive Coevolution in a Host-Parasite Metapopulation.

Pascal Angst1,2, Christoph R Haag2,3, Frida Ben-Ami2,4

  • 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Zoology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Molecular Ecology
|July 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Host population structure significantly impacts parasite evolution. This study shows host dynamics can accelerate genetic drift in the microsporidian parasite Hamiltosporidium tvaerminnensis, leading to slower parasite evolution than previously assumed.

Keywords:
daphniahost–parasite interactionsloss of heterozygositymicrosporidiapopulation structureruns of homozygosity

More Related Videos

Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance
09:00

Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance

Published on: May 2, 2018

11.9K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

3.5K
Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance
09:00

Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance

Published on: May 2, 2018

11.9K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Parasitology
  • Population Genetics

Background:

  • Parasites adaptively evolve to exploit hosts.
  • Transmission bottlenecks and host population structure can induce genetic drift in parasites, limiting their adaptive evolution.
  • The interplay between host population dynamics and parasite evolution remains incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of host population structure on the genomic evolution of the microsporidian parasite Hamiltosporidium tvaerminnensis.
  • To analyze the co-evolutionary dynamics between H. tvaerminnensis and its host, Daphnia magna, within a dynamic metapopulation.
  • To determine if host population structure accelerates genetic drift in parasite populations.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal whole-genome allele frequency tracking of 59 host (Daphnia magna) and parasite (Hamiltosporidium tvaerminnensis) subpopulations over 10 years.
  • Analysis of co-dispersal and isolation-by-distance patterns between host and parasite.
  • Identification of genetic signatures, including runs of homozygosity (ROHs), in parasite populations.

Main Results:

  • Both host and parasite exhibited co-dispersal and isolation-by-distance, but host allele frequencies were more dynamic, showing recurrent genetic bottlenecks.
  • Parasite populations displayed high shared heterozygosity but also subpopulation-specific runs of homozygosity (ROHs).
  • Host population structure and metapopulation dynamics leave a traceable genomic signature in the parasite, suggesting accelerated drift.

Conclusions:

  • Host population structure and metapopulation dynamics significantly shape parasite genomic evolution.
  • Host-mediated parasite population bottlenecks can lead to the fixation of deleterious ROHs in parasite subpopulations.
  • Contrary to expectations, parasites may evolve more slowly than their hosts, with host dynamics potentially accelerating parasite drift.