Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
Antithrombotic Treatment After Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-MAC Procedures: A Systematic Review and
Gonçalo Terleira Batista1, Gonçalo Costa2, Joana Delgado Silva2
1Serviço de Cardiologia. Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal.
Insights
Anticoagulation may reduce valve thrombosis after valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, and valve-in-mitral annular calcification procedures. Further research is needed due to limited data on bleeding and mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Limited evidence exists on optimal antithrombotic therapy post-valve-in-valve (ViV), valve-in-ring (ViR), and valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC) procedures.
- Increased risk of thrombosis observed in ViV interventions necessitates further investigation.
- Current antithrombotic strategies require optimization for these specific transcatheter valve procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the potential benefits of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in ViV, ViR, and ViMAC procedures.
- To assess the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic strategies in patients undergoing these interventions.
- To identify gaps in current research regarding antithrombotic management for complex valve interventions.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and grey literature up to December 2023.
- Inclusion of observational and interventional studies with comparative analysis of antithrombotic strategies.
- Primary endpoints: clinical and total valve thrombosis (VT); safety endpoint: major bleeding. Analysis of mitral position valves and valve types.
Main Results:
- Included five observational studies and one case series (1082 participants).
- Anticoagulation associated with significantly lower clinical VT (1.1% vs 8.3%) and total VT (1.3% vs 8.5%) rates compared to antiplatelets.
- Data on bleeding events was insufficient for thorough analysis.
Conclusions:
- Anticoagulation regimens show potential benefit in reducing high valve thrombosis rates after ViV, ViR, and ViMAC procedures.
- Lack of randomized controlled trials and comprehensive bleeding/mortality data highlights the need for further investigation.
- Future research should focus on randomized trials to establish optimal antithrombotic strategies and safety profiles.
Introduction:
While antithrombotic therapy following transcatheter valve implantation has been extensively studied in various clinical trials, there remains a notable gap in evidence regarding the optimal approach following valve-in-valve (ViV), valve-in-ring (ViR) and valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC) procedures, warranting further assessment. This gap is particularly concerning due to the apparent increased risk of thrombosis associated with ViV interventions. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the potential benefits of anticoagulation in ViV, ViR, and ViMAC procedures.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, as well as the grey literature, for observational and interventional studies published until December 2023. Trials were included if a comparative analysis between the two antithrombotic strategies was feasible and excluded if patients under 18 years old were analysed. The primary efficacy endpoints were incidence of clinical and total valve thrombosis (VT), major bleeding was the sole safety primary endpoint. Additional analyses were performed regarding valves in the mitral position and valve type. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data was assessed using the Review Manager 5.4 software.
Results:
A total of five observational and one case series were included (n = 614 on anticoagulation and n = 468 on antiplatelets), comprising a total of 1082 participants. Clinical VT rates were 4.2% for all procedures, and patients on anticoagulants were associated with a a lower risk of clinical VT (1.1% vs 8.3%; OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.42, I2: 0%) and total VT (1.3% vs 8.5%; OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.37, I2: 0%). Regarding bleeding events, the existing literature did not provide adequate information to enable a thorough analysis.
Conclusion:
Our study suggests a potential benefit of anticoagulation regimens to decrease the high rates of VT following valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring and valve-in-mitral annular calcification procedures. However, the lack of randomized controlled trials and data on bleeding and mortality emphasises the necessity for further research.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

