Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
People make suboptimal decisions about existential risks
Adam Elga1, Jian-Qiao Zhu2, Thomas L Griffiths3
1Department of Philosophy, Princeton University, United States of America.
None:
Allocating resources to maximize the probability that humanity survives a set of existential risks has a different structure from many decision problems, as the objective is the product of the probabilities of desired outcomes rather than the sum. We derive the optimal solution to this problem and use this solution to evaluate the choices that people make when presented with decisions that have this multiplicative structure. Our participants (total N=2,072) are appropriately sensitive to how responsive a risk is to investment, but are conservative in their decisions and do not allocate enough resources to risks with lower probability of survival. This pattern persists even with alternative framings that emphasize survival probabilities. Our results highlight a systematic flaw in people's intuitions about how to respond to existential risks, and suggest that people may have particular difficulty with decisions that involve multiplicative objectives.
More Related Videos
09:07Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
The Availability Heuristic
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Ethical Dilemmas II