Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Determination of Renal Drug Clearance: Graphical and Midpoint Methods01:07

Determination of Renal Drug Clearance: Graphical and Midpoint Methods

203
Renal clearance, a crucial parameter in pharmacokinetics, can be determined using two different methods: the graphical method and the midpoint method. These methods provide insights into the rate of drug excretion by the kidneys and aid in assessing renal function.
The graphical method involves plotting the rate of drug excretion in urine against the plasma drug concentration. By analyzing the graph, the clearance can be calculated and obtained. Drugs rapidly excreted by the kidneys exhibit a...
203
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods01:08

Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods

278
Renal clearance is a critical parameter encompassing kidney filtration, secretion, and reabsorption processes. It is calculated using a specific equation to determine the rate at which the kidneys clear a drug.
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
278
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

151
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
151
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis00:59

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis

127
Noncompartmental analyses offer an alternative method for describing drug pharmacokinetics without relying on a specific compartmental model. In this approach, the drug's pharmacokinetics are assumed to be linear, with the terminal phase log-linear. This assumption allows for simplified analysis and interpretation of the drug's behavior in the body.
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
127
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

177
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
177
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models01:17

Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models

101
Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter traditionally defined by compartment models, signifying the rate at which a drug is expelled from the body. However, a noncompartmental model offers an alternative method for assessing clearance, primarily employing empirical data obtained after administering a single drug dose.
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
101

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Model Ensembling and Machine Learning Approaches to Predict the First Dose of Amoxicillin in Intensive Care.

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology·2026
Same author

Population pharmacokinetics of dalbavancin: external validation, model averaging, and implications for precision dosing in prolonged therapy.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2026
Same author

Causal inference and digital twins: a roadmap for the future of clinical trials.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Human serum albumin profiling by top-down analysis enables multi-class liver fibrosis staging: a cross-platform validation study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Monte Carlo simulations identify suboptimal PK/PD target attainment with standard maribavir dosing.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2026
Same author

Raltegravir Plasma Exposure: A Machine Learning-Based Model for its Prediction Using Limited Sampling Strategy.

The AAPS journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
08:38

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS

Published on: November 8, 2015

17.0K

Estimation of Overall Cyclosporine Exposure Using Machine Learning.

Jean-Baptiste Woillard1,2,3, Marc Labriffe1,2,3, Pierre Marquet1,2,3

  • 1Univ. Limoges, P&T, Limoges, France.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
|July 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models accurately predict cyclosporine drug exposure (AUC0-12 h) using limited blood samples, offering a resource-efficient alternative to traditional methods for transplant patients.

Keywords:
ISBAXGBoostcyclosporinemachine learningpopulation pharmacokinetics

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis
09:16

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis

Published on: June 18, 2020

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
08:38

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS

Published on: November 8, 2015

17.0K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis
09:16

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis

Published on: June 18, 2020

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Computational Biology
  • Transplant Medicine

Background:

  • Cyclosporine (CsA) monitoring is crucial for transplant success.
  • Interdose area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12 h) is a key exposure metric.
  • Traditional AUC monitoring is resource-intensive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Develop and evaluate XGBoost machine learning (ML) models for CsA AUC0-12 h prediction.
  • Compare ML model performance against maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP-BE).
  • Assess prediction accuracy using two or three blood concentrations.

Main Methods:

  • Trained supervised ML models using patient data (2009 patients, 6360 requests).
  • Included CsA concentrations (C0, C1, C3), dose, age, and sampling time as predictors.
  • Validated models externally using pharmacokinetic profiles from various transplant recipients.

Main Results:

  • Three-sample XGBoost model showed high accuracy in kidney transplant recipients, comparable to MAP-BE.
  • Two-sample ML model offered lower precision but was useful in limited sampling situations.
  • Performance decreased for heart and lung recipients due to dataset limitations.

Conclusions:

  • ML-based AUC prediction is a viable alternative to MAP-BE, especially for kidney transplants.
  • Further research should expand datasets and refine ML models for broader use.
  • Incorporating diverse transplant types will enhance ML model generalizability.