Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025
![Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58641.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury
Published on: November 9, 2018
Validation of SUV thresholds in [¹⁸F]SiTATE PET/CT for accurate meningioma segmentation
Nabeel Mansour1, Julian Joram2, Freba Grawe3,4
1Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Nabeel.Mansour@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Purpose:
Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET/CT provides valuable clinical insights beyond standard imaging in meningioma patients. Due to its excellent diagnostic capabilities and favorable logistics, the 18F-labeled SSTR-targeting peptide SiTATE is increasingly in demand. We aimed to validate a recently proposed standard uptake value (SUV) threshold for accurate meningioma delineation in a clinically diverse patient cohort, including complex anatomical locations and lesions with prior surgical intervention.
Methods:
Consecutive patients with known or suspected meningioma who underwent [18F]SiTATE PET/CT and contrast enhanced cerebral MRI were included. Lesions were semi-automatically segmented on PET images using an individualized minimal SUV (SUVmin) within a manually defined volume of interest. Correlative CT and MRI images were used to refine segmentations for each lesion, identifying the optimal lesion-specific SUVmin to accurately capture the true volume of the meningioma. All lesions were additionally segmented using the recently proposed threshold of 4.0, and resulting volumes were compared.
Results:
61 patients with 109 lesions were analyzed: 40 (37%) extraosseous, 32 (29%) partial trans-osseous, and 37 (34%) predominantly intraosseous. The median optimal SUVmin for lesion delineation was 4.2. Osseous involvement did not significantly affect the median SUVmin (p = 0.1). Individualized SUV volumes showed excellent absolute agreement with those obtained using the fixed threshold of 4.0 (ICC[A,1] = 0.967; 95% CI: 0.952-0.977; p < 0.0001). However, 17 lesions (SUVmax < 4.2) were not captured by the fixed threshold.
Conclusion:
The proposed SUV threshold of 4.0 showed promising results, supporting its suitability for clinical practice. Although limitations were evident, with 16% of lesions - primarily very small - showing reduced uptake and therefore not captured by this threshold, the study underscores its applicability in clinical practice.

