Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Grouping Digital Health Apps Based on Their Quality and User Ratings Using K-Medoids Clustering: Cross-Sectional
Maciej Marek Zych1, Raymond Bond1, Maurice Mulvenna1
1School of Computing, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast, BT15 1AP, United Kingdom, 44 7526852505.
Digital health app quality varies significantly, with many apps lacking professional and clinical assurance (PCA). User ratings do not always reflect PCA, highlighting a need for better quality control in digital health solutions.
Area of Science:
- Digital health
- Health informatics
- Software quality assurance
Background:
- Over 350,000 digital health apps exist, necessitating quality assessment for user safety.
- Digital health apps offer proactive healthcare, potentially reducing provider burden.
- Understanding digital health app typologies can identify areas for improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clusters of digital health apps based on quality metrics: professional and clinical assurance (PCA), user experience (UX), data privacy (DP), and user ratings.
- To investigate associations between app typologies and factors like NICE Evidence Standard Framework (ESF) tiers, target users, categories, and features.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 1402 digital health app assessments using the Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Apps Baseline Review (OBR).
- Employed k-medoids clustering to determine app typologies and the elbow method for optimal cluster identification.
- Assessed normality of user ratings and OBR scores using the Shapiro-Wilk test and compared cluster differences with Wilcoxon rank sum tests.
Main Results:
- Four distinct app clusters were identified: poor user ratings (15.7%), poor PCA and DP (18%), poor PCA (29.6%), and high-quality (36.7%).
- Statistically significant, but small effect size, associations were found between clusters and NICE ESF tiers, categories, and features.
- The 'Service Signposting' feature and NICE ESF tier B showed the strongest associations with app clusters.
Conclusions:
- A significant portion of digital health apps, even those with high user ratings, exhibit deficiencies in professional and clinical assurance (PCA).
- The identified typology highlights PCA as a critical area for improvement in digital health applications.
- Limited association between app characteristics and quality clusters suggests a need for further research into factors influencing digital health app quality.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Healthcare Agencies I
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

