Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
Published on: January 21, 2017
A Prospective Study of a New 24-2C Algorithm Using the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard
Euido Nishijima1, Takahiko Noro1, Kei Sano1
1Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-shimbashi, Tokyo, Japan.
Purpose:
To compare the performance of the 24-2C Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Faster and Standard with the 10-2 SITA Standard in assessing visual function in patients with glaucoma.
Design:
A multicenter prospective cross-sectional study.
Participants:
Overall, 71 eyes of 71 patients with primary open-angle or normal-tension glaucoma were included.
Methods:
The participants underwent visual field testing using the 24-2C SITA Faster, 24-2C SITA Standard (research prototype), and 10-2 SITA Standard in a randomized order on the same day. The global indices, threshold values, total deviation (TD), pattern deviation (PD), and test durations of the algorithms were compared. Correlations among the 10-2 SITA Standard mean deviation (MD) and number of depressed test point locations in the TD and PD probability plots at P < 5%, P < 2%, and P < 1% significance levels within the central 10° were analyzed.
Main Outcome Measures:
Differences in global indices, threshold values, TD, PD, and test duration between algorithms. Correlations of the MD and number of TD and PD points of the 10-2 SITA Standard and those of the central 10° region for the 24-2C algorithms.
Results:
No significant differences were found in the global indices between the 24-2C SITA Faster and Standard. The 24-2C SITA Faster had a significantly shorter test duration (55.2% shorter) than the 24-2C SITA Standard. The 24-2C SITA Standard was 45.2% shorter than the combined 24-2 SITA Standard plus 10-2 SITA Standard. The 24-2C SITA Standard showed significantly higher correlation with the 10-2 SITA Standard than the 24-2C SITA Faster.
Conclusions:
There were no significant differences in global indices between the 24-2C SITA Standard and 24-2C SITA Faster. However, the 24-2C SITA Standard showed a stronger correlation with the 10-2 SITA Standard. The 24-2C SITA Standard demonstrates potential for more effectively assessing central visual field function in patients with glaucoma.
Financial Disclosure(S):
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Related Concept Videos
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The test works...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Critical Numbers and the Closed Interval Method
Midpoint Rule
Synthetic Disvision of Polynomials

