Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Published on: August 22, 2018
The moralistic fallacy in a selective critique of admixture regression: Commentary on Bird et al. (2024)
Gregory Connor, John G R Fuerst1
1Department of Biotechnology, University of Maryland.
Abstract:
Bird et al. (2024) propose an effective ban on admixture regression research that uses cognitive test scores as the dependent variable. Their core argument is moral and political, but they also offer a scientific critique of the methodology. Many highly regarded admixture regression studies examining a wide range of medical and psychological traits fall within their scientific critique, despite a lack of moral or political salience. Rejecting the scientific legitimacy of admixture regression analysis if the dependent variable is politically sensitive but accepting it if the dependent variable is politically painless may entail the moralistic fallacy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Fundamental Attribution Error
Genetic Drift
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Epistasis Analysis

