Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

150
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
150
Altruism01:03

Altruism

41.6K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
41.6K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

246.4K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
246.4K
Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

10.4K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
10.4K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

73.3K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
73.3K
Crossing Over01:34

Crossing Over

147.9K
Unlike mitosis, meiosis aims for genetic diversity in its creation of haploid gametes. Dividing germ cells first begin this process in prophase I, where each chromosome—replicated in S phase—is now composed of two sister chromatids (identical copies) joined centrally.
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
147.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Food Insecurity and Cognitive Performance Among Young People Living With and Without HIV: A Study Across Four African Countries.

AIDS and behavior·2026
Same author

Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus co-infection among people living with HIV in four countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Navigating birth plans: illuminating neonatal provider perspectives in prenatally diagnosed complex fetal anomalies.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
Same author

Characterizing multimorbidity and the risk for hospitalization among people living with HIV from the African Cohort Study.

BMC global and public health·2026
Same author

Association Between Solid Organ Transplantation and Oral Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry·2026
Same author

Listen to the Learner: A Grounded Theory Approach to Clinical Reasoning Remediation in Pediatric Residency.

Academic pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Downward Trends in Neonatal Hepatitis B Vaccine Uptake: 2021 to 2025.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Use of Stigmatizing Language in Pediatric Clinician Notes.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Lead Locally, Impact Nationally: Roles and Responsibilities for Site PI in PHM Research.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Trends, Outcomes, and Resource Use of Pediatric Tracheostomy in Alberta: A Cohort Study.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Too Complex to Treat? Equity in Access to Inpatient Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Caregiver Perspectives on Preventing Future Hospitalizations for Children With Medical Complexity.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

5.7K

Practical Approaches for Navigating Authorship Conflict.

Paul Michel1, Priti Bhansalia2, Lisa E Herrmann3,4

  • 1Division of Hospital Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.

Hospital Pediatrics
|July 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Navigating academic research authorship can be challenging. This study offers tools for researchers to prevent and resolve common authorship conflicts, ensuring fair credit and responsibility.

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.0K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

403

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

5.7K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.0K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

403

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Academic Publishing

Background:

  • Authorship in academic medicine is a critical aspect of scientific research, conferring both credit and responsibility.
  • Transparent discussions about authorship can be difficult, particularly for junior researchers, due to its high value and sensitive nature.
  • Contentious authorship scenarios are common in academic research settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide researchers with practical tools for preventing and managing authorship conflicts.
  • To empower junior researchers to confidently navigate authorship disputes.
  • To outline systematic approaches for identifying authors, defining roles, and resolving conflicts.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic identification of authorship criteria.
  • Development of frameworks for outlining author roles and responsibilities.
  • Recognition and categorization of common authorship conflict types.
  • Establishment of escalation pathways for conflict resolution.

Main Results:

  • Researchers can employ specific tools to proactively prevent authorship disputes.
  • Effective strategies exist for navigating and resolving the majority of authorship conflicts.
  • Clear guidelines can be established for author roles, mitigating potential disagreements.
  • Defined channels for escalating unresolved conflicts ensure fair resolution.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing systematic tools can significantly reduce authorship conflicts in scientific research.
  • Empowering researchers with conflict resolution strategies fosters a healthier academic environment.
  • Transparent authorship practices are essential for maintaining research integrity and collaboration.