Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.8K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.8K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.9K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.9K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.3K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

7.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
7.1K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.1K
Chebyshev's Theorem to Interpret Standard Deviation01:15

Chebyshev's Theorem to Interpret Standard Deviation

4.5K
Chebyshev’s theorem, also known as Chebyshev’s Inequality, states that the proportion of values of a dataset for K standard deviation is calculated using the equation:
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rocuronium Dose and First-Attempt Intubation Success in the Critically Ill: Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter Trials.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

The CARE framework for AI dataset documentation in clinical laboratories: a comprehensive checklist and data lineage methodology.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same author

United Global Advocacy Drives Updates to World Health Organization Essential Medicines List.

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia·2026
Same author

Impact of measurable residual disease on outcomes using a modified DFCI protocol for adults with BCR-ABL negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Leukemia research·2026
Same author

Stratifying Risk and Treatment Benefit: A Model Predicting Overall Survival in Men with Metastatic De Novo Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer in Trials Investigating Docetaxel (the STOPCAP Collaboration).

European urology focus·2026
Same author

Discovery of an Artificial Intelligence Label Feedback Loop: How the Success of a Clinically Implemented Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Has Created an Unforeseen Challenge to Algorithm Retraining.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Subsampled Exponential Mechanism: Differential Privacy in Large Output Spaces.

AISec. ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K

Differential Privacy for Classifier Evaluation.

Kendrick Boyd1, Eric Lantz1, David Page2

  • 1Department of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Aisec. ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security
|July 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Differential privacy protects sensitive data. This study introduces new methods for accurately calculating machine learning model performance metrics, like ROC curve area, while maintaining privacy guarantees.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies

Background:

  • Differential privacy (DP) offers strong data protection guarantees.
  • Existing DP methods primarily focus on model training, not performance evaluation.
  • Reporting ML model performance metrics can inadvertently disclose private information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop differentially private mechanisms for computing ML evaluation metrics.
  • To address the privacy risks associated with reporting model performance.
  • To enable secure and private evaluation of machine learning models.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated differentially private algorithms for calculating key performance metrics.
  • Focused on metrics such as Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve.
  • Developed and analyzed novel privacy-preserving computation techniques.

Main Results:

  • Successfully identified effective differentially private mechanisms for ROC AUC calculation.
  • Demonstrated the feasibility of computing average precision with differential privacy.
  • Quantified the privacy-utility trade-offs for the proposed methods.

Conclusions:

  • Differentially private computation of ML evaluation metrics is achievable and necessary.
  • The developed methods enable private reporting of model performance.
  • This work advances the field of privacy-preserving machine learning evaluation.