Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eccentric Loading01:16

Eccentric Loading

500
Eccentric loading is a crucial concept in the study of structural engineering and mechanics, particularly when analyzing the stability and stress distribution in columns. Unlike centric loading, where the force is applied along the centroidal axis, causing uniform compression, eccentric loading occurs when a force is applied off-center. This off-center application introduces not only direct compressive stress but also bending stress, significantly influencing the column's behavior under...
500
Impact Loading01:19

Impact Loading

285
Impact loading occurs when a moving object collides with a stationary structure, such as a rod with a uniform cross-sectional area fixed at one end. Under these conditions, the rod absorbs the kinetic energy from the striking object, leading to deformation and subsequent stress development. As the rod returns to its original position and reaches maximum stress, the absorbed energy, initially manifested as kinetic energy, transforms entirely into strain energy.
In cases of elastic deformation,...
285
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

323
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
323

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring the Validity of the Velocity Matters Linear Position Transducer in the Back Squat and Bench Press.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Seasonal Changes in Performance, Physiological, and Kinematic Factors of Maximal Incremental Swimming in Elite Open-Water Swimmers.

International journal of sports physiology and performance·2026
Same author

In the Reign of Velocity: Ballistic Training Enhances Rapid Force Production in Chronically Strength-Trained Athletes.

International journal of sports physiology and performance·2025
Same author

Interplay Among Muscle Oxygen Saturation, Activation, and Power on a Swim-Bench.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Effects of Different Velocity Loss Thresholds in Full Squat With and Without Blood Flow Restriction on Strength Gains, Neuromuscular Adaptations, and Muscle Hypertrophy.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2025
Same author

Maximising Triathlon Health and Performance: The State of the Art.

Sports (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
07:30

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations

Published on: May 1, 2018

15.5K

How Does Load Selection and Sex Influence 1RM Prediction Using the Minimal Velocity Threshold During Free-Weight Back

Emanuele Dello Stritto1, Ruggero Romagnoli2, Michele Nocchi1

  • 1Department of Human Movement and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza L. De Bosis 15, 00135 Rome, Italy.

Sports (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Predicting one-repetition maximum (1RM) in free-weight back squats is possible using the load-velocity relationship. Optimal prediction requires using specific minimum velocity thresholds (MVT) for males and females, avoiding high-velocity loads.

Keywords:
injury preventionload–velocity relationshipregression modelresistance trainingsex differencevelocity-based training

More Related Videos

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

9.2K
Determining The Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold Following a Single Visit Exercise Test
06:00

Determining The Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold Following a Single Visit Exercise Test

Published on: July 27, 2015

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
07:30

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations

Published on: May 1, 2018

15.5K
Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

9.2K
Determining The Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold Following a Single Visit Exercise Test
06:00

Determining The Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold Following a Single Visit Exercise Test

Published on: July 27, 2015

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Sports Science
  • Biomechanics
  • Strength and Conditioning

Background:

  • The one-repetition maximum (1RM) is a key indicator of maximal strength.
  • Predicting 1RM is valuable for training prescription, but traditional testing can be time-consuming and risky.
  • The load-velocity relationship offers a potential alternative for 1RM prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To predict 1RM in the free-weight back squat using the load-velocity relationship.
  • To investigate the efficacy of different minimum velocity thresholds (MVT) for 1RM prediction.
  • To determine if sex-specific MVTs are necessary for accurate 1RM prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-five males and twenty-five females completed a 1RM free-weight back squat test.
  • Individual load-velocity relationships were established based on the 1RM test.
  • Ten regression models were developed using two-point and three-point linear equations with varying MVTs (0.25, 0.30, 0.40 m·s⁻¹).

Main Results:

  • Accurate 1RM prediction was achieved in males using an MVT of 0.30 m·s⁻¹.
  • Accurate 1RM prediction was achieved in females using an MVT of 0.25 m·s⁻¹.
  • An MVT of 0.30 m·s⁻¹ underestimated 1RM in females, and 0.40 m·s⁻¹ underestimated 1RM in both sexes.

Conclusions:

  • 1RM can be accurately predicted in free-weight back squats using the load-velocity relationship.
  • Sex-specific MVTs (0.30 m·s⁻¹ for males, 0.25 m·s⁻¹ for females) improve prediction accuracy.
  • Regression models should exclude loads exceeding 1 m·s⁻¹ for optimal 1RM prediction.