Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

A Novel Application of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Imaging
Published on: September 17, 2013
Exploring the Validity of the Velocity Matters Linear Position Transducer in the Back Squat and Bench Press
Emanuele Dello Stritto1, Antonio Gramazio1, Ruggero Romagnoli2
1Department of Human Movement and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza L. De Bosis 15, 00135 Rome, Italy.
None:
The purpose of the present study was to validate a new linear encoder by comparing the mean velocity (MV) and peak velocity (PV) of two linear position transducers during free-weight back squat (SQ) and bench press (BP) exercises. Barbell velocity was simultaneously recorded using GymAware (version 5.1.0; reference standard) and Velocity Matters. Fifteen male participants completed two testing sessions, each involving six repetitions (two sets of three) across five velocity ranges: >1.00 to 0.51 m·s-1 (velocity range 1: >1.00 m·s-1; velocity range 2: 0.87-0.99 m·s-1; velocity range 3: 0.75-0.86 m·s-1; velocity range 4: 0.63-0.74 m·s-1; velocity range 5: 0.51-0.62 m·s-1) in SQ and >1.02 to 0.40 m·s-1 (velocity range 1: >1.02 m·s-1; velocity range 2: 0.86-1.01 m·s-1; velocity range 3: 0.70-0.85 m·s-1; velocity range 4: 0.56-0.69 m·s-1; velocity range 5: 0.40-0.55 m·s-1) in BP. In total, 180 repetitions per velocity range were analyzed for each exercise. Validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation (r), mean absolute error (MAE), Bland-Altman plots, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Pearson's r indicated good (0.5-0.7) to excellent (>0.9) correlations across all ranges and exercises. However, acceptable MAE values were found only for MV in SQ (except at >1.00 m·s-1) and for both MV and PV in BP at velocities <0.70 m·s-1. Despite an acceptable MAE in some cases, Bland-Altman analyses revealed systematic underestimation by Velocity Matters, with wide limits of agreement of up to -0.08 m·s-1 in SQ and -0.09 m·s-1 in BP, even where MAE was acceptable. ICC values were generally >0.70 but showed wide confidence intervals, indicating high uncertainty. CCC values were consistently poor (<0.90) across all velocity ranges and both exercises, except for PV in the lowest velocity range during BP. In conclusion, Velocity Matters may be cautiously used to monitor MV during SQ at velocities <0.87 m·s-1, but it does not provide sufficient accuracy for use in BP across any load.
Related Concept Videos
Velocity and Position by Graphical Method
Velocity and Position by Integral Method
Consider an example to calculate the velocity and position from the acceleration function. A motorboat is traveling at a constant velocity of 5.0 m/s when it starts to decelerate to arrive at the dock. Its acceleration is...
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Relative Velocity in Two Dimensions
Velocity Potential

