Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
Development, validation and test-retest reliability of a load cell-based device for assessment of isometric forearm
Miika Köykkä1,2, Iida Laatikainen-Raussi2, Sami Vierola1
1Finnish Institute of High Performance Sport KIHU, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Abstract:
Objectives.This study aimed to develop and validate a load cell-based device for measuring isometric forearm rotation torque and to determine its test-retest reliability.Approach.The custom-built device was calibrated using known weights and validated against a high-precision torque transducer. For reliability assessment, 35 physically active participants (20 males, 15 females; age 30 ± 7 years) were tested for isometric forearm pronation and supination strength 5-7 d apart.Main results.The custom device demonstrated excellent validity (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), absolute agreement = 1.00;r2= 1.00,p< 0.001; mean difference = -1.26-1.44%,p< 0.001). Test-retest reliability was excellent for absolute pronation and supination torque (ICC = 0.88-0.97; coefficient of variation percentage (CV%) = 4.1-5.6; minimal detectable change (MDC) at 90% confidence level = 13.1-19.9%), good to excellent for supination:pronation ratios (ICC = 0.60-0.88; CV% = 7.0-8.6; MDC = 0.10-0.13), and fair to good for dominant:non-dominant ratios (ICC = 0.42-0.66; CV% = 6.1-7.6; MDC = 0.07-0.10). Sex significantly influenced absolute torque values, with males demonstrating consistently higher torque, although reliability metrics were similar for both sexes.Significance.The device is valid, and the test is reliable. It is suitable for clinical assessments, rehabilitation monitoring, and performance evaluation, facilitating an improved understanding of factors affecting elbow overloading and injuries. Limb ratio metrics should be interpreted with caution due to their lower reliability.

