Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Approaches for Establishing Trust and Alleviating Stress During the Surrogate Informed Consent Process for Critical
Caroline K Tietbohl1, Chloe Glaros2, Kristen A Torres3
1Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Background:
Trust with researchers is a consideration among surrogate decision makers (SDMs) who are approached to provide consent for research participation on behalf of critically ill patients. However, little is known about strategies that researchers can use to build trust with SDMs and alleviate stress when making these decisions.
Research Question:
What are the best approaches to building trust and alleviating stress that can be used in the surrogate informed consent process?
Study Design And Methods:
This convergent parallel mixed-methods study included surveys, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews with principal investigators (PIs), research coordinators (RCs), SDMs, and critically ill patients who were approached for participation in a critical care research clinical trial. Surveys captured opinions regarding trust and stress in the surrogate consent process, and qualitative findings described factors that influenced the trust and stress of the SDMs in this context.
Results:
Overall, 230 individuals (90 PIs, 105 RCs, 27 SDMs, and 8 patients) completed surveys, and 61 (24 PIs, 23 RCs, 11 SDMs, and 3 patients) participated in focus groups/interviews. Three approaches were identified that participants described across data sources as significant for establishing trust and reducing stress among SDMs: (1) humanizing research participation; (2) tailoring approaches to patient/SDM background (eg, race, location, prior research experience); and (3) transparent communication about study details. Participants felt that researchers first needed to show that they were considering the patient as "a person," not as a study participant. Taking time to learn about and address aspects of the patient's or SDM's background was important, as was the manner in which study details were communicated. Although all participant groups largely agreed about the relevance of these factors, some differences between groups were noted.
Interpretation:
Three strategies were identified that PIs, RCs, SDMs, and patients viewed as effective for building trust and alleviating stress in the surrogate informed consent process. Incorporating these approaches could enhance trust and participation in critical care research.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Obedience
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...

