Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

150
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
150
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

387
Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
387
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview01:20

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview

1.1K
Pharmacokinetic models utilize mathematical analysis to achieve a detailed quantitative understanding of a drug's life cycle within the body. They are instrumental in simulating a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, predicting drug concentrations over time, optimizing dosage regimens, linking concentrations with pharmacologic activity, and estimating potential toxicity.
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
1.1K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

17.9K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
17.9K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.9K
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches01:14

Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches

228
Drug disposition in the body is a complex process and can be studied using two major approaches: the model and the model-independent approaches.
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
228

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Loss of the USP22 deubiquitylase confers resistance to chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Adaptive plasticity of aspartate metabolism in succinate dehydrogenase-deficient cancer cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Succinate dehydrogenase loss suppresses pyrimidine biosynthesis via succinate-mediated inhibition of aspartate transcarbamylase.

Nature metabolism·2026
Same author

An agentic AI system for automated pharmacogenomic recommendation generation.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Right ventricular function assessment by transesophageal echocardiography in lung transplantation: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations.

JHLT open·2025
Same author

Identification of therapeutic targets for renal medullary carcinoma via integrated genomic and transcriptomic profiling.

Cell reports. Medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

3.8K

Benchmarking large language models for replication of guideline-based PGx recommendations.

Mike Zack1, Ioan Slobodchikov2, Danil Stupichev2

  • 1PGxAI Inc., 330 E Charleston Rd, Palo Alto, CA, 94306, USA. mz@pgx.ai.

The Pharmacogenomics Journal
|July 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Large language models (LLMs) show promise for generating pharmacogenomic (PGx) recommendations. A domain-adapted LLM achieved superior accuracy and speed compared to general models, enabling safer AI-driven personalized medicine.

More Related Videos

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

684
Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
13:33

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications

Published on: November 19, 2013

39.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

3.8K
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

684
Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
13:33

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications

Published on: November 19, 2013

39.2K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Pharmacogenomics
  • Clinical Decision Support

Background:

  • Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored for clinical applications.
  • Accurate pharmacogenomic (PGx) recommendations are crucial for personalized medicine.
  • Existing LLMs may lack the specificity for complex clinical guidelines like CPIC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical accuracy of LLMs in generating pharmacogenomic (PGx) recommendations.
  • To compare the performance of general-purpose LLMs against domain-adapted models for PGx.
  • To establish a framework for assessing PGx-specific LLM performance.

Main Methods:

  • A benchmark of 599 curated gene-drug-phenotype scenarios was used.
  • Five leading LLMs, including GPT-4o and fine-tuned LLaMA variants, were evaluated.
  • A novel semantic evaluation framework (LLM Score), validated by expert review, was employed alongside lexical metrics.

Main Results:

  • General-purpose LLMs frequently generated incomplete or unsafe PGx recommendations.
  • A domain-adapted LLM achieved a high LLM Score of 0.92, indicating superior performance.
  • The domain-adapted model demonstrated significantly faster inference speeds compared to others.

Conclusions:

  • Fine-tuning and structured prompting are critical for developing accurate PGx LLMs, surpassing model scale alone.
  • Domain-specific adaptation is essential for safe and effective AI in pharmacogenomics.
  • This study validates a framework for evaluating PGx LLMs and supports AI-driven personalized medicine.