Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Traditional Versus Contemporary Models for Identifying Causes of Maternal Death: A Population-Based Study
Yasser Sabr1,2, Sarka Lisonkova1,3, Amélie Boutin4
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia and the Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Using multiple causes of death for maternal mortality analysis reveals different leading causes than underlying cause analysis. This multiple cause approach may better inform public health priorities for reducing maternal deaths.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Accurate identification of maternal death causes is crucial for effective public health interventions.
- Current methods often rely on the underlying cause of death, potentially overlooking contributing factors.
- Understanding differences in cause assignment is vital for refining maternal mortality reduction strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare cause-of-maternal-death assignment using underlying cause versus multiple causes of death.
- To analyze the impact of different assignment methods on the ranking of leading maternal mortality causes.
- To evaluate the correlation between these two methods over time.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional, population-based study utilizing US data from 1999-2002 and 2018-2022.
- Analysis of 1633 maternal deaths (1999-2002) and 1929 maternal deaths (2018-2022).
- Quantification and ranking of six selected obstetrical causes of death based on underlying and multiple causes.
Main Results:
- In 2018-2022, pre-eclampsia was the leading cause by underlying cause, while hemorrhage led by multiple causes.
- Rankings differed significantly between the two methods in 2018-2022 (correlation coefficient 0.62, p=0.19).
- A significant correlation was observed in 1999-2002 (correlation coefficient 0.83, p=0.04), suggesting a shift in analysis impact.
Conclusions:
- The multiple causes-of-death approach provides a different perspective on maternal mortality patterns compared to the underlying cause method.
- Utilizing multiple causes may offer a more comprehensive understanding for prioritizing clinical and public health efforts.
- This approach could lead to more effective strategies for reducing maternal mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Regression Toward the Mean
Cancer Survival Analysis

